TY - JOUR
T1 - A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception
T2 - Contributions from judgment and decision-making research
AU - Peters, Ellen
AU - McCaul, Kevin D.
AU - Stefanek, Michael
AU - Nelson, Wendy
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation (0111941 and 0241313) to Dr. Ellen Peters and from the National Cancer Institute (K05 CA92633) to Dr. Kevin McCaul.
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - Background: The likelihood judgments that people make about their risks for cancer have important implications. At the individual level, risk estimates guide protective actions, such as cancer screening. However, at the extremes, exaggerated risk judgments can also lead to anxiety that degrades quality of life or to aggressive self-protective actions that are unwarranted given the objective risks. At the policy level, risk judgments may serve as an indicator of societal perceptions of the "war" against cancer. Using risk judgments, the public expresses its belief about whether we are winning. Purpose: We present theoretical perspectives from judgment and decision making, illustrate how they can explain some of the existing empirical findings in the cancer risk literature, and describe additional predictions that have not yet been tested. Conclusions: Overall, we suggest that theories from the judgment and decision-making perspective offer a potentially powerful view for understanding and improving risk judgments for cancer and other diseases.
AB - Background: The likelihood judgments that people make about their risks for cancer have important implications. At the individual level, risk estimates guide protective actions, such as cancer screening. However, at the extremes, exaggerated risk judgments can also lead to anxiety that degrades quality of life or to aggressive self-protective actions that are unwarranted given the objective risks. At the policy level, risk judgments may serve as an indicator of societal perceptions of the "war" against cancer. Using risk judgments, the public expresses its belief about whether we are winning. Purpose: We present theoretical perspectives from judgment and decision making, illustrate how they can explain some of the existing empirical findings in the cancer risk literature, and describe additional predictions that have not yet been tested. Conclusions: Overall, we suggest that theories from the judgment and decision-making perspective offer a potentially powerful view for understanding and improving risk judgments for cancer and other diseases.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644534820&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644534820&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1207/s15324796abm3101_8
DO - 10.1207/s15324796abm3101_8
M3 - Review article
C2 - 16472038
AN - SCOPUS:33644534820
SN - 0883-6612
VL - 31
SP - 45
EP - 52
JO - Annals of Behavioral Medicine
JF - Annals of Behavioral Medicine
IS - 1
ER -