TY - JOUR
T1 - Barostat or dynamic balloon distention test
T2 - Which technique is best suited for esophageal sensory testing?
AU - Remes-Troche, J. M.
AU - Attaluri, A.
AU - Chahal, P.
AU - Rao, S. S.C.
PY - 2012/9
Y1 - 2012/9
N2 - Esophageal sensation is commonly assessed by barostat-assisted balloon distension (BBD) or dynamic balloon distension (DBD) technique, but their relative merits are unknown. Our aim was to compare the usefulness and tolerability of both techniques. Sixteen healthy volunteers (male/female = 6/10) randomly underwent graded esophageal balloon distensions, using either BBD (n= 8) or DBD (n= 8). BBD was performed by placing a 5-cm long highly compliant balloon attached to a barostat, and DBD by placing a 5-cm long balloon attached to a leveling container. Intermittent phasic balloon distensions were performed in increments of 6mmHg. Sensory thresholds and biomechanical properties were assessed and compared. Sensory thresholds for first perception (mean ± standard deviation; 21 ± 6 vs. 21.2 ± 5, mmHg, P= 0.9), discomfort (38 ± 8 vs. 35 ± 9, P= 0.5), and pain (44 ± 4 vs. 45 ± 3, P= 0.7) were similar with BBD and DBD techniques. However, more subjects tolerated DBD (7/8, 88%) when compared with BBD (4/8, 50%). Forceful expulsion of balloon into stomach (n= 4), pulling around the mouth (n= 4), chest discomfort (n= 2) and retching (n= 2) were overlapping reasons for intolerance with BBD. Esophageal wall distensibility was similar with both techniques. Both techniques provided comparable data on biomechanical properties. However, DBD was better tolerated than BBD for evaluation of esophageal sensation. Hence, we recommend DBD for performing esophageal balloon distension test.
AB - Esophageal sensation is commonly assessed by barostat-assisted balloon distension (BBD) or dynamic balloon distension (DBD) technique, but their relative merits are unknown. Our aim was to compare the usefulness and tolerability of both techniques. Sixteen healthy volunteers (male/female = 6/10) randomly underwent graded esophageal balloon distensions, using either BBD (n= 8) or DBD (n= 8). BBD was performed by placing a 5-cm long highly compliant balloon attached to a barostat, and DBD by placing a 5-cm long balloon attached to a leveling container. Intermittent phasic balloon distensions were performed in increments of 6mmHg. Sensory thresholds and biomechanical properties were assessed and compared. Sensory thresholds for first perception (mean ± standard deviation; 21 ± 6 vs. 21.2 ± 5, mmHg, P= 0.9), discomfort (38 ± 8 vs. 35 ± 9, P= 0.5), and pain (44 ± 4 vs. 45 ± 3, P= 0.7) were similar with BBD and DBD techniques. However, more subjects tolerated DBD (7/8, 88%) when compared with BBD (4/8, 50%). Forceful expulsion of balloon into stomach (n= 4), pulling around the mouth (n= 4), chest discomfort (n= 2) and retching (n= 2) were overlapping reasons for intolerance with BBD. Esophageal wall distensibility was similar with both techniques. Both techniques provided comparable data on biomechanical properties. However, DBD was better tolerated than BBD for evaluation of esophageal sensation. Hence, we recommend DBD for performing esophageal balloon distension test.
KW - Barostat
KW - Chest pain
KW - Dynamic balloon distension
KW - Esophagus
KW - Sensory testing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866280308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866280308&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01294.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01294.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 22168228
AN - SCOPUS:84866280308
SN - 1120-8694
VL - 25
SP - 584
EP - 589
JO - Diseases of the Esophagus
JF - Diseases of the Esophagus
IS - 7
ER -