Abstract
End of life discussions frequently take place in surgical intensive care units, as a significant number of patients die while admitted to the hospital, and surgery is common during the last month of life. Multiple barriers exist to the initiation of these conversations, including: miscommunication between clinicians and surrogates, a paternalistic approach to surgical patients, and perhaps, conflicts of interest as an unwanted consequence of surgical quality reporting. Goal discordant care refers to the care that is provided to a patient that is incapacitated and that is not concordant to his/her wishes. This is a largely unrecognized medical error with devastating consequences, including inappropriate prolongation of life and non-beneficial therapy utilization. Importantly, hospice and palliative care needs to be recognized as quality care in order to deter the incentives that might persuade clinicians from offering these services.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1064-1070 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs |
|
| State | Published - Sep 2021 |
Keywords
- end of life
- goal discordant care
- inappropriate prolongation of life
- quality reporting
- surgical intensive care
- surgical mortality reporting
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine