Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

BCR-ABL fusion transcript types and levels and their interaction with secondary genetic changes in determining the phenotype of Philadelphia chromosome positive leukemias

  • Dan Jones
  • , Rajyalakshmi Luthra
  • , Jorge Cortes
  • , Deborah Thomas
  • , Susan O'Brien
  • , Carlos Bueso-Ramos
  • , Seema Hai
  • , Farhad Ravandi
  • , Marcos De Lima
  • , Hagop Kantarjian
  • , Jeffrey L. Jorgensen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It remains unresolved how different BCR-ABL transcripts differentially drive lymphoid and myeloid proliferation in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) leukemias. We compared BCR-ABL transcript type and level with kinase domain (KD) mutation status, genotype, and phenotype in 1855 Ph + leukemias. Compared with e1a2/p190 BCR-ABL cases, de novo e13-e14a2/p210 Ph+ lymphoid leukemia more frequently showed CML-type back-ground, had higher blast-normalized BCR-ABL transcript levels, and more frequent persistent BCR-ABL transcript in the absence of detectable lymphoblasts. Secondary lymphoid blast transformation of CML was exclusively due to e13/e14a2/ p210 BCR-ABL but was associated, at a much higher level than p210 myeloid transformation, with acquisition of new KD mutations and/or Ph genomic amplification. In contrast, myeloid blast transformation was more frequently accompanied by new acquisition of acute myeloid leukemia-type chromosomal aberrations, particularly involving the EVI1 and RUNX1 loci. Therefore, higher kinase activity by mutation, transcriptional up-regulation or gene amplification appears required for lymphoid transformation by p210 BCR-ABL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5190-5192
Number of pages3
JournalBlood
Volume112
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2008
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Immunology
  • Hematology
  • Cell Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'BCR-ABL fusion transcript types and levels and their interaction with secondary genetic changes in determining the phenotype of Philadelphia chromosome positive leukemias'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this