TY - JOUR
T1 - Building and sustaining restorative community trust and engagement
T2 - the Co-Researcher Activation Network
AU - Ledford, Christy J.W.
AU - Williamson, Lillie D.
AU - Whisenant, Ebony B.
AU - Greene, Traci T.
AU - Jones, Samantha R.
AU - Waller, Jennifer L.
AU - Sidibe, Teena S.
AU - Jackson, Felton David
AU - Lawson, Nikeshia La Shaundra
AU - Moore, Justin X.
AU - Wolf, Leslie E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Background: After identifying substantial trust gaps between our university and neighboring community, we developed the Co-Researcher Activation Network (CRANE) to cultivate restorative engagement through ongoing transformational relationships. Informed by the Culture-Centered Approach, CRANE is a network of community member groups who identify local health concerns, develop research questions, and generate community-driven solutions. Organized by place rather than interest, groups are systematically created within geographic areas. The model focuses on engaging community members as “co-researchers,” whereby community members play an active role and share in the decision-making process through a collaborative and interdependent relationship with the research team. Methods: Using RE-AIM domains, we applied convergent mixed methods to test the effects of CRANE and to identify factors associated with fidelity and sustainability of the model. Results: From 2022 to 2023, we convened 21 co-researchers in three groups that met bimonthly. Groups reflected age, racial/ethnic, economic, and educational diversity. Co-researchers’ perceptions of university researcher credibility (trustworthiness, expertise, and caring) significantly increased during the project. Five factors contributed to success: regular, audience-centered communication; small groups; gender segregation; scheduling flexibility; and community meeting spaces. Challenges included hiring issues, travel limits, low technology acceptance, transportation obstacles, and participant payment problems. Conclusions: CRANE is a blueprint for community engagement that honors community members and their expertise, strives for equitable partnership, and moves the needle on metrics of trust. The theoretically-grounded, co-researcher model can not only build but sustain restorative community trust and engagement.
AB - Background: After identifying substantial trust gaps between our university and neighboring community, we developed the Co-Researcher Activation Network (CRANE) to cultivate restorative engagement through ongoing transformational relationships. Informed by the Culture-Centered Approach, CRANE is a network of community member groups who identify local health concerns, develop research questions, and generate community-driven solutions. Organized by place rather than interest, groups are systematically created within geographic areas. The model focuses on engaging community members as “co-researchers,” whereby community members play an active role and share in the decision-making process through a collaborative and interdependent relationship with the research team. Methods: Using RE-AIM domains, we applied convergent mixed methods to test the effects of CRANE and to identify factors associated with fidelity and sustainability of the model. Results: From 2022 to 2023, we convened 21 co-researchers in three groups that met bimonthly. Groups reflected age, racial/ethnic, economic, and educational diversity. Co-researchers’ perceptions of university researcher credibility (trustworthiness, expertise, and caring) significantly increased during the project. Five factors contributed to success: regular, audience-centered communication; small groups; gender segregation; scheduling flexibility; and community meeting spaces. Challenges included hiring issues, travel limits, low technology acceptance, transportation obstacles, and participant payment problems. Conclusions: CRANE is a blueprint for community engagement that honors community members and their expertise, strives for equitable partnership, and moves the needle on metrics of trust. The theoretically-grounded, co-researcher model can not only build but sustain restorative community trust and engagement.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019377568
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019377568#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1186/s40900-025-00792-2
DO - 10.1186/s40900-025-00792-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105019377568
SN - 2056-7529
VL - 11
JO - Research Involvement and Engagement
JF - Research Involvement and Engagement
IS - 1
M1 - 123
ER -