Abstract
Objective: Following evolutionary psychology, we argue that physical stature matters in preferences regarding political leadership. Particularly, a preference for physically formidable leaders evolved to promote survivability in the violent human ancestral history. Methods: We present two studies of original data to assess individual attitudes regarding the association between physical stature and political leadership. Analytical methods include ordered probit regression. Results: The findings are consistent with the evolutionary theory presented here. Study 1 indicates that individuals tend to prefer leaders with greater physical stature, while Study 2 indicates that males with greater physical stature are more likely to think of themselves as qualified to be a leader and, through this increased sense of efficacy, they are more likely to demonstrate interest in pursuing a leadership position. Conclusion: Consistent with emerging evidence from other research perspectives, political behavior, in this case preferences regarding political leadership, is shaped by both environmental and evolutionary forces.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1215-1235 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Social Science Quarterly |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2011 |
| Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Social Sciences
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Caveman Politics: Evolutionary Leadership Preferences and Physical Stature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS