Clinical policy: Critical issues in the evaluation and management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute headache

  • Andy S. Jagoda
  • , William C. Dalsey
  • , Phillip G. Fairweather
  • , Steven A. Godwin
  • , Devorah Nazarian
  • , Stephen V. Cantrill
  • , William C. Dalsey
  • , Stephen A. Colucciello
  • , Wyatt W. Decker
  • , Francis M. Fesmire
  • , Steven A. Godwin
  • , John M. Howell
  • , Alan H. Itzkowitz
  • , Andy S. Jagoda
  • , Stephen Karas
  • , Edwin K. Kuffner
  • , Thomas W. Lukens
  • , Thomas P. Martin
  • , Jessie Moore
  • , David L. Morgan
  • Barbara A. Murphy, Scott M. Silvers, Bonnie Simmons, Suzanne Wall, Robert L. Wears, George W. Molzen, Robert E. Suter, Rhonda Whitson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

68 Scopus citations

Abstract

This clinical policy focuses on critical issues in the evaluation and management of patients with acute headache. A MEDLINE search was performed, abstracts were reviewed, and appropriate full-text articles were read; references from reviewed articles were searched for additional material. This policy focuses on 4 areas of current interest and/or controversy in acute headache management: (1) response to headache therapy as an indicator of underlying pathology, (2) clinical findings predictive of increased intracranial pressure, (3)indications for emergent neuroimaging in patients with a complaint of headache, and (4) indications to pursue emergent diagnostic studies in patients with thunderclap headache but with normal findings on a head computed tomography (CT) scan and negative findings on a lumbar puncture. Recommendations for patient management are provided for each of these 4 topics based on strength of evidence. Level A recommendations represent patient management principles that reflect a high degree of clinical certainty, Level B recommendations represent patient management principles that reflect moderate clinical certainty, and Level C recommendations represent other patient management strategies based on preliminary, inconclusive, or conflicting evidence, or based on panel consensus. This guideline is intended for physicians working in hospital-based emergency departments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)108-122
Number of pages15
JournalAnnals of emergency medicine
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical policy: Critical issues in the evaluation and management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acute headache'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this