TY - JOUR
T1 - Combination therapies for traumatic brain injury
T2 - Retrospective considerations
AU - Margulies, Susan
AU - Anderson, Gail
AU - Atif, Fahim
AU - Badaut, Jerome
AU - Clark, Robert
AU - Empey, Philip
AU - Guseva, Maria
AU - Hoane, Michael
AU - Huh, Jimmy
AU - Pauly, Jim
AU - Raghupathi, Ramesh
AU - Scheff, Stephen
AU - Stein, Donald
AU - Tang, Huiling
AU - Hicks, Mona
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Beth Ansel and Michael Weinrich of the NIH for their leadership in developing and administering the research initiative that supported these studies. We also thank Stephen Ashwal, Richard Hartman, and Andre Obenaus of Loma Linda University for their thoughtful discussions. The research was supported by NIH grants R01 HD061944, R01 HD061946, R01 HD061963, R01 HD061966, R01 HD061971, R01 NS069247, and U01 NS069545.
Publisher Copyright:
© Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2016.
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - Patients enrolled in clinical trials for traumatic brain injury (TBI) may present with heterogeneous features over a range of injury severity, such as diffuse axonal injury, ischemia, edema, hemorrhage, oxidative damage, mitochondrial and metabolic dysfunction, excitotoxicity, inflammation, and other pathophysiological processes. To determine whether combination therapies might be more effective than monotherapy at attenuating moderate TBI or promoting recovery, the National Institutes of Health funded six preclinical studies in adult and immature male rats to evaluate promising acute treatments alone and in combination. Each of the studies had a solid rationale for its approach based on previous research, but only one reported significant improvements in long-term outcomes across a battery of behavioral tests. Four studies had equivocal results because of a lack of sensitivity of the outcome assessments. One study demonstrated worse results with the combination in comparison with monotherapies. While specific research findings are reported elsewhere, this article provides an overview of the study designs, insights, and recommendations for future research aimed at therapy development for TBI.
AB - Patients enrolled in clinical trials for traumatic brain injury (TBI) may present with heterogeneous features over a range of injury severity, such as diffuse axonal injury, ischemia, edema, hemorrhage, oxidative damage, mitochondrial and metabolic dysfunction, excitotoxicity, inflammation, and other pathophysiological processes. To determine whether combination therapies might be more effective than monotherapy at attenuating moderate TBI or promoting recovery, the National Institutes of Health funded six preclinical studies in adult and immature male rats to evaluate promising acute treatments alone and in combination. Each of the studies had a solid rationale for its approach based on previous research, but only one reported significant improvements in long-term outcomes across a battery of behavioral tests. Four studies had equivocal results because of a lack of sensitivity of the outcome assessments. One study demonstrated worse results with the combination in comparison with monotherapies. While specific research findings are reported elsewhere, this article provides an overview of the study designs, insights, and recommendations for future research aimed at therapy development for TBI.
KW - pharmacological interventions
KW - preclinical therapeutic development
KW - treatments
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952949019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952949019&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/neu.2014.3855
DO - 10.1089/neu.2014.3855
M3 - Article
C2 - 25970337
AN - SCOPUS:84952949019
SN - 0897-7151
VL - 33
SP - 101
EP - 112
JO - Central Nervous System Trauma
JF - Central Nervous System Trauma
IS - 1
ER -