TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of the use of D-enantiomeric and L-enantiomeric antimicrobial peptides incorporated in a calcium-chelating irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis root canal wall biofilms
AU - Ye, Wei hu
AU - Yeghiasarian, Lara
AU - Cutler, Christopher W.
AU - Bergeron, Brian E.
AU - Sidow, Stephanie
AU - Xu, Hockin H.K.
AU - Niu, Li na
AU - Ma, Jing zhi
AU - Tay, Franklin R.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors declare no conflict of interest associated with the present study. The study was supported by grant 81873714 (PI: Jingzhi Ma), grant 81720108011 (PI: Franklin Tay), grants 81722015 and 81870805 (PI: Li-na Niu) from the National Natural Science Foundation of China .
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - Objectives: To compare the anti-biofilm efficacy of two antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), 1018 and DJK-5, in disrupting canal wall biofilms in the isthmus, canal and dentinal tubules of single-rooted maxillary premolars. Methods: Enterococcus faecalis single-species biofilms were formed in-situ in the root canal system of the premolars (n = 91). Confocal laser scanning microscopy, bacterial sampling, colony-forming unit counting, XTT assay, lactate dehydrogenase assay and phenol-sulphuric acid method were used to identify the anti-biofilm efficacy of both AMPs and their influence on bacterial metabolic activity. Results: Both AMPs disrupted in-situ E. faecalis biofilms and altered their metabolic activity. At 20 μg/mL, the D-enantiomeric AMP DJK-5 killed 55.5 %, 57.3 % and 55.8 % of biofilm bacteria in the isthmus, canal and dentinal tubules, respectively, in 1 min. In contrast, the L-enantiomeric AMP 1018 only eradicated 25.6 %, 25.5 % and 27.5 % of biofilm bacteria in the isthmus, canal and dentinal tubules, respectively, within the same time. Anti-biofilm efficacy of the root canal irrigants tested were in the order: 6 % NaOCl > 20 μg/mL DJK-5 > 10 μg/mL DJK-5 > 20 μg/mL 1018 > 10 μg/mL 1018 > 0.9 % NaCl. Conclusions: The present results are confirmatory of previous studies, in that D-enantiomeric AMPs exhibit more potent antibacterial properties than L-enantiomeric AMPs against E. faecalis biofilms within the canal space. Nevertheless, the potency of both AMPs are concentration-dependent. Incorporation of these agents into EDTA, a non-antibacterial calcium-chelating irrigant for removal of the inorganic component of the canal space debris, does not reduce the efficacy of either AMP. Clinical Significance: The present study provides the proof of concept that incorporation of an antimicrobial peptide into a calcium-chelating root canal irrigant enhances the disinfection of intratubular single-species biofilms during smear layer and smear plug removal.
AB - Objectives: To compare the anti-biofilm efficacy of two antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), 1018 and DJK-5, in disrupting canal wall biofilms in the isthmus, canal and dentinal tubules of single-rooted maxillary premolars. Methods: Enterococcus faecalis single-species biofilms were formed in-situ in the root canal system of the premolars (n = 91). Confocal laser scanning microscopy, bacterial sampling, colony-forming unit counting, XTT assay, lactate dehydrogenase assay and phenol-sulphuric acid method were used to identify the anti-biofilm efficacy of both AMPs and their influence on bacterial metabolic activity. Results: Both AMPs disrupted in-situ E. faecalis biofilms and altered their metabolic activity. At 20 μg/mL, the D-enantiomeric AMP DJK-5 killed 55.5 %, 57.3 % and 55.8 % of biofilm bacteria in the isthmus, canal and dentinal tubules, respectively, in 1 min. In contrast, the L-enantiomeric AMP 1018 only eradicated 25.6 %, 25.5 % and 27.5 % of biofilm bacteria in the isthmus, canal and dentinal tubules, respectively, within the same time. Anti-biofilm efficacy of the root canal irrigants tested were in the order: 6 % NaOCl > 20 μg/mL DJK-5 > 10 μg/mL DJK-5 > 20 μg/mL 1018 > 10 μg/mL 1018 > 0.9 % NaCl. Conclusions: The present results are confirmatory of previous studies, in that D-enantiomeric AMPs exhibit more potent antibacterial properties than L-enantiomeric AMPs against E. faecalis biofilms within the canal space. Nevertheless, the potency of both AMPs are concentration-dependent. Incorporation of these agents into EDTA, a non-antibacterial calcium-chelating irrigant for removal of the inorganic component of the canal space debris, does not reduce the efficacy of either AMP. Clinical Significance: The present study provides the proof of concept that incorporation of an antimicrobial peptide into a calcium-chelating root canal irrigant enhances the disinfection of intratubular single-species biofilms during smear layer and smear plug removal.
KW - Antimicrobial peptide
KW - Biofilm
KW - E. faecalis
KW - Irrigant
KW - Root canal
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075346341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075346341&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103231
DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103231
M3 - Article
C2 - 31712128
AN - SCOPUS:85075346341
SN - 0300-5712
VL - 91
JO - Journal of Dentistry
JF - Journal of Dentistry
M1 - 103231
ER -