TY - JOUR
T1 - Complexity of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations during the course of therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia
AU - Verma, Dushyant
AU - Fava, Carmen
AU - Kantarjian, Hagop
AU - Cortes, Jorge
PY - 2009/4
Y1 - 2009/4
N2 - The most common mechanism of acquired resistance in CML in imatinib era is the acquisition of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations with decreased sensitivity to the drug. At time of resistance, treatment of CML now involves sequential use of second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Persistence of pre-existing mutations, as well as development of new mutations is a mechanism of resistance to the new TKI. In-vitro, mutations can be low, intermediate or highly sensitive to the different TKIs. However the in-vitro testing may not translate to in-vivo results. In fact we describe the case of one patient, who never had any cytogenetic response, developed G250E mutation on imatinib (G250E in-vitro sensitivity good for nilotinib dasatinib and intermediate for imatinib) that persisted on nilotinib and dasatinib, and developed a V299L mutation while on dasatinib (in-vitro intermediate sensitivity). Another patient never achieved cytogenetic response, developed E355G mutation on imatinib (intermediate in-vitro sensitivity to imatinib) that persisted on nilotinib, and once switched to dasatinib developed F317L mutation (intermediate in-vitro sensitivity). These patients exemplify the complexities of resistance of TKI therapy and argue for the need to investigate mechanisms of resistance beyond mutations.
AB - The most common mechanism of acquired resistance in CML in imatinib era is the acquisition of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations with decreased sensitivity to the drug. At time of resistance, treatment of CML now involves sequential use of second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Persistence of pre-existing mutations, as well as development of new mutations is a mechanism of resistance to the new TKI. In-vitro, mutations can be low, intermediate or highly sensitive to the different TKIs. However the in-vitro testing may not translate to in-vivo results. In fact we describe the case of one patient, who never had any cytogenetic response, developed G250E mutation on imatinib (G250E in-vitro sensitivity good for nilotinib dasatinib and intermediate for imatinib) that persisted on nilotinib and dasatinib, and developed a V299L mutation while on dasatinib (in-vitro intermediate sensitivity). Another patient never achieved cytogenetic response, developed E355G mutation on imatinib (intermediate in-vitro sensitivity to imatinib) that persisted on nilotinib, and once switched to dasatinib developed F317L mutation (intermediate in-vitro sensitivity). These patients exemplify the complexities of resistance of TKI therapy and argue for the need to investigate mechanisms of resistance beyond mutations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64549129927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64549129927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ajh.21366
DO - 10.1002/ajh.21366
M3 - Article
C2 - 19260121
AN - SCOPUS:64549129927
SN - 0361-8609
VL - 84
SP - 256
EP - 257
JO - American Journal of Hematology
JF - American Journal of Hematology
IS - 4
ER -