Abstract
This study builds on the history of economic well-being (EWB) index construction to develop such an index for urban U.S. counties (population > 62,437). Unlike previous studies, we rely on external validation of economic well-being to construct a best-fit index, where our external validation approach follows the Tiebout Hypothesis. We estimate a best-fit, linear regression-based index, in which lagged features of economic well-being are weighted based on ability to explain subsequent county population change. Compared to an arbitrarily equally-weighted model using a composite index a model using lagged weighted EWB individual variables provide greater transparency while also explaining substantially more variation in population change across urban counties (19.9% vs. 15.7%).
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 45-63 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Public Choice |
| Volume | 199 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2024 |
Keywords
- Composite indicators
- Economic well-being
- Index validation
- Tiebout hypothesis
- Tiebout sorting
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Constructing and validating a best-fit economic well-being index for urban U.S. counties: a Tiebout model approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS