TY - JOUR
T1 - Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Reveals Partial Perfusion Recovery After Hindlimb Ischemia as Opposed to Full Recovery by Laser Doppler Perfusion Imaging
AU - Becker, Alyssa B.
AU - Chen, Lanlin
AU - Ning, Bo
AU - Hu, Song
AU - Hossack, John A.
AU - Klibanov, Alexander L.
AU - Annex, Brian H.
AU - French, Brent A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank R. John Lye and Vijay C. Ganta for their help and advice on mouse HLI models of PAD. They also thank Jim Patrie, MS, in the University of Virginia Department of Public Health Sciences for his contribution to the statistical analysis of the time course of the recovery data set. This work was supported by American Heart Association Grant 15PRE25100003 (A.B.B.) and National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NIH/NHLBI) Grant R01HL116455 (MPI to B.H.A. and B.A.F.).
Funding Information:
This work was supported by American Heart Association Grant 15PRE25100003 (A.B.B.) and National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NIH/NHLBI) Grant R01HL116455 (MPI to B.H.A. and B.A.F.).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
PY - 2022/6
Y1 - 2022/6
N2 - Mouse models are critical in developing new therapeutic approaches to treat peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Despite decades of research and numerous clinical trials, the efficacy of available therapies is limited. This may suggest shortcomings in our current animal models and/or methods of assessment. We evaluated perfusion measurement methods in a mouse model of PAD by comparing laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI, the most common technique), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS, an emerging technique) and fluorescent microspheres (conventional standard). Mice undergoing a femoral artery ligation were assessed by LDPI and CEUS at baseline and 1, 4, 7, 14, 28, 60, 90 and 150 d post-surgery to evaluate perfusion recovery in the ischemic hindlimb. Fourteen days after surgery, additional mice were measured with fluorescent microspheres, LDPI, and CEUS. LDPI and CEUS resulted in broadly similar trends of perfusion recovery until 7 d post-surgery. However, by day 14, LDPI indicated full recovery of perfusion, whereas CEUS indicated ∼50% recovery, which failed to improve even after 5 mo. In agreement with the CEUS results, fluorescent microspheres at day 14 post-surgery confirmed that perfusion recovery was incomplete. Histopathology and photoacoustic microscopy provided further evidence of sustained vascular abnormalities.
AB - Mouse models are critical in developing new therapeutic approaches to treat peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Despite decades of research and numerous clinical trials, the efficacy of available therapies is limited. This may suggest shortcomings in our current animal models and/or methods of assessment. We evaluated perfusion measurement methods in a mouse model of PAD by comparing laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI, the most common technique), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS, an emerging technique) and fluorescent microspheres (conventional standard). Mice undergoing a femoral artery ligation were assessed by LDPI and CEUS at baseline and 1, 4, 7, 14, 28, 60, 90 and 150 d post-surgery to evaluate perfusion recovery in the ischemic hindlimb. Fourteen days after surgery, additional mice were measured with fluorescent microspheres, LDPI, and CEUS. LDPI and CEUS resulted in broadly similar trends of perfusion recovery until 7 d post-surgery. However, by day 14, LDPI indicated full recovery of perfusion, whereas CEUS indicated ∼50% recovery, which failed to improve even after 5 mo. In agreement with the CEUS results, fluorescent microspheres at day 14 post-surgery confirmed that perfusion recovery was incomplete. Histopathology and photoacoustic microscopy provided further evidence of sustained vascular abnormalities.
KW - Ischemia
KW - Perfusion imaging
KW - Peripheral arterial disease
KW - Ultrasound
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126310992&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126310992&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.02.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.02.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 35287996
AN - SCOPUS:85126310992
SN - 0301-5629
VL - 48
SP - 1058
EP - 1069
JO - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
JF - Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
IS - 6
ER -