TY - JOUR
T1 - Controversies Surrounding the Use of Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotic Medications for the Treatment of Patients with Schizophrenia
AU - Kane, John M.
AU - McEvoy, Joseph P.
AU - Correll, Christoph U.
AU - Llorca, Pierre Michel
N1 - Funding Information:
John M. Kane has been a consultant for or received honoraria from Alkermes, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Janssen, Johnson and Johnson, Karuna, LB Pharmaceuticals, Lundbeck, Lyndra, Merck, Neurocrine Biosciences, Otsuka, Pierre Fabre, Reviva, Roche, Saladex, Sunovion, Takeda, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; has received grant support from Otsuka, Lundbeck, and Janssen; and is a shareholder of LB Pharmaceuticals and Vanguard Research Group. Joseph P. McEvoy has received grant/research support from Alkermes, Auspex Pharmaceuticals (Teva Pharmaceutical Industries), Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lundbeck, and Takeda and has served on advisory boards for Intra-Cellular Therapies and Sunovion. Christoph U. Correll has been a consultant for or has received honoraria from AbbVie, Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Axsome Therapeutics, Gedeon Richter, Intra-Cellular Therapies, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Karuna, LB Pharmaceuticals, Laboratorios Farmacéuticos ROVI, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Medscape, Merck, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mylan, Neurocrine, Noven, Otsuka, Pfizer, Recordati, Seqirus, Servier, Sumitomo Dainippon, Sunovion, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, and Viatris; has provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka; has served on data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards for Laboratorios Farmacéuticos ROVI, Lundbeck, Supernus, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda; has received royalties from UpToDate; serves on the board of directors for the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology; and is a shareholder of LB Pharmaceuticals. Pierre-Michel Llorca has been a consultant for or has received honoraria from AbbVie, Allergan, Eisai, Gedeon Richter, Janssen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Sanofi, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; has received travel support from Eisai, Lundbeck, and Janssen; has served on data safety monitoring boards or advisory boards for AbbVie, Allergan, Eisai, Janssen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Sanofi, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries; and has received grant support from and provided expert testimony for Janssen.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Schizophrenia is a serious mental illness that requires continuous and effective long-term management to reduce symptoms, improve quality of life, and prevent relapse. Oral antipsychotic medications have proven efficacy for many patients taking these medications; however, a considerable number of patients continue to experience ongoing symptoms and relapse, often due to lack of adherence. The advent of long-acting injectable (LAI) formulations of antipsychotic medications provided an opportunity to improve treatment adherence and overall patient outcomes. Despite data to support LAI efficacy, safety, and improved adherence over oral formulations, there are several misconceptions about and barriers to LAI implementation within a standard of care for patients with schizophrenia. Areas of resistance around LAIs include (1) doubts regarding their benefits outside of improved adherence, (2) questions regarding their prescribing to a broader population of patients with schizophrenia, (3) when to initiate LAIs, (4) concerns regarding the safety of LAIs in comparison with oral medication, and (5) the most effective ways to educate healthcare providers, patients, and caretakers to enable appropriate LAI consideration and acceptance. Here, we discuss these key controversies associated with LAIs and provide supportive evidence to facilitate LAI use in a manner that is constructive to the clinician–patient relationship and successful treatment.
AB - Schizophrenia is a serious mental illness that requires continuous and effective long-term management to reduce symptoms, improve quality of life, and prevent relapse. Oral antipsychotic medications have proven efficacy for many patients taking these medications; however, a considerable number of patients continue to experience ongoing symptoms and relapse, often due to lack of adherence. The advent of long-acting injectable (LAI) formulations of antipsychotic medications provided an opportunity to improve treatment adherence and overall patient outcomes. Despite data to support LAI efficacy, safety, and improved adherence over oral formulations, there are several misconceptions about and barriers to LAI implementation within a standard of care for patients with schizophrenia. Areas of resistance around LAIs include (1) doubts regarding their benefits outside of improved adherence, (2) questions regarding their prescribing to a broader population of patients with schizophrenia, (3) when to initiate LAIs, (4) concerns regarding the safety of LAIs in comparison with oral medication, and (5) the most effective ways to educate healthcare providers, patients, and caretakers to enable appropriate LAI consideration and acceptance. Here, we discuss these key controversies associated with LAIs and provide supportive evidence to facilitate LAI use in a manner that is constructive to the clinician–patient relationship and successful treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116855693&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85116855693&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s40263-021-00861-6
DO - 10.1007/s40263-021-00861-6
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34636025
AN - SCOPUS:85116855693
SN - 1172-7047
VL - 35
SP - 1189
EP - 1205
JO - CNS Drugs
JF - CNS Drugs
IS - 11
ER -