Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Defining our Terms: Bringing Rigour to Ethnic Studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

For decades, political scientists have grappled with the role identity has played in ethnic conflict. Surprisingly, these scholars have been unsuccessful in rigorously conceptualising some key terms in the field of ethnic studies. How can the causal forces of ethnic strife be unravelled if scholars cannot even agree on the meanings of essential concepts? This article carefully delineates the differences between ethnicity, ethnic groups and ethnic group identity, while showing the conceptual mistakes of some of the field's leading scholars. Often treated synonymously, these concepts are quite distinct: ignoring this not only makes for sloppy scholarship, but has grave policy consequences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)70-76
Number of pages7
JournalPolitics
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Defining our Terms: Bringing Rigour to Ethnic Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this