TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of a decision aid for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit employing user-centered design and a wiki platform for rapid prototyping
AU - Plaisance, Ariane
AU - Witteman, Holly O.
AU - LeBlanc, Annie
AU - Kryworuchko, Jennifer
AU - Heyland, Daren Keith
AU - Ebell, Mark H.
AU - Blair, Louisa
AU - Tapp, Diane
AU - Dupuis, Audrey
AU - Lavoie-Bérard, Carole Anne
AU - McGinn, Carrie Anna
AU - Légaré, France
AU - Archambault, Patrick Michel
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the Respiratory Health Network of the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé, by the Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Secteur Alphonse-Desjardins) and by the Fondation de l’Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis The funders had no role to play in study design, data collection, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The authors would like to thank the Vice-décanat à la recherche et aux études supérieures and the Faculty of Medicine at Université Laval, the Respiratory Health Network of the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé, the Centre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches (Secteur Alphonse-Desjardins) and the Fondation de l’Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis. The authors would also like to thank the nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals who work in the ICU at l’Hôtel-Dieu de Lévis. Special thanks to Nathalie Boucher, Isabelle Michel, Mélanie Constantin, Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, Michael E. Wilson, Christopher Cox, Rim Charaf, Dario Gomez, Fatoumata Tounkara, Carmen Irambona-Nyandwi, Samuel Bilodeau, Alexis Turgeon-Fournier, Jean-Michel Constantin, Matthieu Ratthé, Todd Gorman, Frédérick Noiseux, Mohamed Diah Hachmi, Jean-François Bellemare, Christine Drouin, Benoît Duhaime, Simon Bordeleau, Ann Laberge, Charles Lacroix, Émilie Dubois, Jean-François Tremblay, and Amélie Plaisance. Our utmost respect and appreciation goes to the critically-ill patients and their family members who shared their most personal thoughts and dedicated their time to help improve the creation of this decision aid aiming to improve patient care.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Plaisance et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - Background Upon admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), all patients should discuss their goals of care and express their wishes concerning life-sustaining interventions (e.g., cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)). Without such discussions, interventions that prolong life at the cost of decreasing its quality may be used without appropriate guidance from patients. Objectives To adapt an existing decision aid about CPR to create a wiki-based decision aid individually adapted to each patient’s risk factors; and to document the use of a wiki platform for this purpose. Methods We conducted three weeks of ethnographic observation in our ICU to observe intensivists and patients discussing goals of care and to identify their needs regarding decision making. We interviewed intensivists individually. Then we conducted three rounds of rapid prototyping involving 15 patients and 11 health professionals. We recorded and analyzed all discussions, interviews and comments, and collected sociodemographic data. Using a wiki, a website that allows multiple users to contribute or edit content, we adapted the decision aid accordingly and added the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) prediction rule calculator. Results We added discussion of invasive mechanical ventilation. The final decision aid comprises values clarification, risks and benefits of CPR and invasive mechanical ventilation, statistics about CPR, and a synthesis section. We added the GO-FAR prediction calculator as an online adjunct to the decision aid. Although three rounds of rapid prototyping simplified the information in the decision aid, 60% (n = 3/5) of the patients involved in the last cycle still did not understand its purpose. Conclusions Wikis and user-centered design can be used to adapt decision aids to users’ needs and local contexts. Our wiki platform allows other centers to adapt our tools, reducing duplication and accelerating scale-up. Physicians need training in shared decision making skills about goals of care and in using the decision aid. A video version of the decision aid could clarify its purpose.
AB - Background Upon admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), all patients should discuss their goals of care and express their wishes concerning life-sustaining interventions (e.g., cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)). Without such discussions, interventions that prolong life at the cost of decreasing its quality may be used without appropriate guidance from patients. Objectives To adapt an existing decision aid about CPR to create a wiki-based decision aid individually adapted to each patient’s risk factors; and to document the use of a wiki platform for this purpose. Methods We conducted three weeks of ethnographic observation in our ICU to observe intensivists and patients discussing goals of care and to identify their needs regarding decision making. We interviewed intensivists individually. Then we conducted three rounds of rapid prototyping involving 15 patients and 11 health professionals. We recorded and analyzed all discussions, interviews and comments, and collected sociodemographic data. Using a wiki, a website that allows multiple users to contribute or edit content, we adapted the decision aid accordingly and added the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) prediction rule calculator. Results We added discussion of invasive mechanical ventilation. The final decision aid comprises values clarification, risks and benefits of CPR and invasive mechanical ventilation, statistics about CPR, and a synthesis section. We added the GO-FAR prediction calculator as an online adjunct to the decision aid. Although three rounds of rapid prototyping simplified the information in the decision aid, 60% (n = 3/5) of the patients involved in the last cycle still did not understand its purpose. Conclusions Wikis and user-centered design can be used to adapt decision aids to users’ needs and local contexts. Our wiki platform allows other centers to adapt our tools, reducing duplication and accelerating scale-up. Physicians need training in shared decision making skills about goals of care and in using the decision aid. A video version of the decision aid could clarify its purpose.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042193131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042193131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0191844
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0191844
M3 - Article
C2 - 29447297
AN - SCOPUS:85042193131
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 13
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 2
M1 - e0191844
ER -