Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development of Clinical Pharmacy Key Performance Indicators for Hospital Pharmacists Using a Modified Delphi Approach

  • Olavo Fernandes
  • , Sean K. Gorman
  • , Richard S. Slavik
  • , William M. Semchuk
  • , Steve Shalansky
  • , Jean François Bussières
  • , Douglas Doucette
  • , Heather Bannerman
  • , Jennifer Lo
  • , Simone Shukla
  • , Winnie W.Y. Chan
  • , Natalie Benninger
  • , Neil J. MacKinnon
  • , Chaim M. Bell
  • , Jeremy Slobodan
  • , Catherine Lyder
  • , Peter J. Zed
  • , Kent Toombs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Key performance indicators (KPIs) are quantifiable measures of quality. There are no published, systematically derived clinical pharmacy KPIs (cpKPIs). Objective: A group of hospital pharmacists aimed to develop national cpKPIs to advance clinical pharmacy practice and improve patient care. Methods: A cpKPI working group established a cpKPI definition, 8 evidence-derived cpKPI critical activity areas, 26 candidate cpKPIs, and 11 cpKPI ideal attributes in addition to 1 overall consensus criterion. Twenty-six clinical pharmacists and hospital pharmacy leaders participated in an internet-based 3-round modified Delphi survey. Panelists rated 26 candidate cpKPIs using 11 cpKPI ideal attributes and 1 overall consensus criterion on a 9-point Likert scale. A meeting was facilitated between rounds 2 and 3 to debate the merits and wording of candidate cpKPIs. Consensus was reached if 75% or more of panelists assigned a score of 7 to 9 on the consensus criterion during the third Delphi round. Results: All panelists completed the 3 Delphi rounds, and 25/26 (96%) attended the meeting. Eight candidate cpKPIs met the consensus definition: (1) performing admission medication reconciliation (including best-possible medication history), (2) participating in interprofessional patient care rounds, (3) completing pharmaceutical care plans, (4) resolving drug therapy problems, (5) providing in-person disease and medication education to patients, (6) providing discharge patient medication education, (7) performing discharge medication reconciliation, and (8) providing bundled, proactive direct patient care activities. Conclusions: A Delphi panel of hospital pharmacists was successful in determining 8 consensus cpKPIs. Measurement and assessment of these cpKPIs will serve to advance clinical pharmacy practice and improve patient care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)656-669
Number of pages14
JournalAnnals of Pharmacotherapy
Volume49
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 8 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Delphi consensus
  • clinical pharmacy
  • key performance indicators
  • process-of-care indicators

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of Clinical Pharmacy Key Performance Indicators for Hospital Pharmacists Using a Modified Delphi Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this