TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of finishing method on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations
AU - Brackett, William W.
AU - Gilpatrick, Russell O.
AU - Gunnin, Timothy D.
PY - 1997/12/1
Y1 - 1997/12/1
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the effect of three finishing methods on the microleakage of Class V hybrid resin composite. Materials and Methods: Facial and lingual Class V cavities were prepared at the cemento-enamel junction of bovine incisors. Restorations of the two materials (Z100; Prodigy) were placed, using the supplied dentin-adhesives (Scotchbond Multipurpose; OptiBond FL, respectively). Finishing methods were carbide (C) and diamond (D) finishing instruments operated at high-speed, and finishing disks (S). After thermal cycling, the teeth were immersed in methylene blue dye, then sections of the restored teeth (n=12) were visually assessed for leakage. Results: No leakage was observed at the resin-enamel interface in any restoration. At gingival margins, the incidence of leakage (slight/severe) was: Z100 D = 4/3, C = 5/3, S = 2/0; Prodigy D = 3/0, C = 2/4, S = 3/2. The greatest incidence of leakage was observed in restorations finished with carbide finishing burs. A two-way ANOVA of leakage data rankings showed no significant difference among the three methods (P= 0.07) or between the two materials (P= 0.55), and no significant interaction of material and finishing method (P= 0.07).
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the effect of three finishing methods on the microleakage of Class V hybrid resin composite. Materials and Methods: Facial and lingual Class V cavities were prepared at the cemento-enamel junction of bovine incisors. Restorations of the two materials (Z100; Prodigy) were placed, using the supplied dentin-adhesives (Scotchbond Multipurpose; OptiBond FL, respectively). Finishing methods were carbide (C) and diamond (D) finishing instruments operated at high-speed, and finishing disks (S). After thermal cycling, the teeth were immersed in methylene blue dye, then sections of the restored teeth (n=12) were visually assessed for leakage. Results: No leakage was observed at the resin-enamel interface in any restoration. At gingival margins, the incidence of leakage (slight/severe) was: Z100 D = 4/3, C = 5/3, S = 2/0; Prodigy D = 3/0, C = 2/4, S = 3/2. The greatest incidence of leakage was observed in restorations finished with carbide finishing burs. A two-way ANOVA of leakage data rankings showed no significant difference among the three methods (P= 0.07) or between the two materials (P= 0.55), and no significant interaction of material and finishing method (P= 0.07).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031197086&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031197086&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 9590906
AN - SCOPUS:0031197086
SN - 0894-8275
VL - 10
SP - 189
EP - 191
JO - American Journal of Dentistry
JF - American Journal of Dentistry
IS - 4
ER -