Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of finishing protocols on dentin surface characteristics and bond strength after tooth preparation for indirect restorations

  • Paola Bernardes
  • , Amanda das Graças Soares
  • , Bárbara Inácio de Melo
  • , Leandro Maruki Pereira
  • , Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb
  • , Rafael Rocha Pacheco
  • , Marcel Santana Prudente
  • , Luís Henrique Araújo Raposo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Statement of problemThe impact of different finishing protocols following preparation for indirect restorations on surface roughness, smear layer, and bond strength remains unclear, with potential implications for clinical longevity.PurposeThe purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of different dentin finishing protocols on surface (roughness and morphology), smear layer thickness, and bond strength to a resin-matrix glass-ceramic.Material and methodsUnused preparation instruments were characterized under scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and 144 human third molars were prepared and divided into groups: control (medium grit diamond rotary instruments, no finishing [CT]), fine/superfine diamond rotary instruments [FB], fine/superfine tungsten carbide burs [CB], fine/superfine ultrasonic diamond tips [UT], SiC/Al₂O₃ mounted stones [MS], fine/superfine sintered diamond rotary instruments [SB], Al₂O₃ airborne-particle abrasion [AO], and resin coating [RC]. Surface roughness and morphology were analyzed using laser scanning confocal microscopy and SEM. Smear layer thickness was assessed using SEM combined with the ImageJ software program, and bond strength was evaluated using microtensile testing. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc tests were used for statistical analysis, followed by Pearson correlation. Failure modes were analyzed using the chi-squared test (α=.05).ResultsSignificant differences in surface roughness, smear layer thickness, and bond strength were observed across the groups (P<.001). All finishing protocols resulted in lower surface roughness and higher bond strength compared with the control. RC achieved the highest bond strength, followed by MS. A very weak correlation was found between surface roughness, smear layer thickness, and bond strength.ConclusionsFinishing protocols affect dentin roughness, smear layer, and bond strength after tooth preparation. Resin coating and fine and superfine mounted SiC and Al₂O₃ stones improved adhesion and may enhance outcomes for indirect restorations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)371.e1-371.e11
JournalJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume135
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2026

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oral Surgery
  • General Dentistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of finishing protocols on dentin surface characteristics and bond strength after tooth preparation for indirect restorations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this