TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of pulpotomy in managing carious exposure in mature permanent teeth
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Wang, Wenying
AU - Zeng, Qian
AU - Li, Yuanyuan
AU - Sun, Yutong
AU - Kim, Timothy
AU - Tang, Jocelyn
AU - Bergeron, Brian E.
AU - Tay, Franklin
AU - Gu, Lisha
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - Objectives: This quantitative systematic review evaluated whether pulpotomy performed with hydraulic calcium silicate cements may be used as an alternative to root canal treatment (RCT) in mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure. Data sources: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. No language restrictions were applied. The search included randomised controlled trials that compared pulpotomy to root canal treatment for managing carious exposure in mature permanent teeth. Study selection: Studies were selected based on predetermined inclusion criteria: randomised controlled trials involving mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure, using hydraulic calcium silicate cements for pulpotomy. Non-comparative studies, case reports, and trials involving primary or immature permanent teeth were excluded. Data: Data were extracted on success rates, clinical outcomes, follow-up periods, pain profiles, and potential complications. A meta-analysis was performed, revealing no statistically significant differences in success rates between pulpotomy and RCT. Both interventions demonstrated success rates exceeding 90 % at one-year and two-year follow-up periods. Pain profiles consistently showed lower post-operative pain intensity in the pulpotomy group compared to the RCT group during the first week. Potential complications, such as non-responsive pulp and difficulties in determining pulp vitality, were reported more frequently in the pulpotomy group. Conclusions: Pulpotomy with bioactive hydraulic calcium silicate cements shows comparable success rates to RCT in managing carious pulp exposure in mature permanent teeth. The results suggest pulpotomy as a viable, less invasive alternative to RCT, particularly in cases where preservation of pulp vitality is paramount. Clinical significance: This systematic review highlights pulpotomy as a less invasive and cost-effective alternative to root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth. With comparable success rates and lower post-operative pain, pulpotomy offers a promising approach to managing carious exposure and preserving tooth vitality.
AB - Objectives: This quantitative systematic review evaluated whether pulpotomy performed with hydraulic calcium silicate cements may be used as an alternative to root canal treatment (RCT) in mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure. Data sources: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. No language restrictions were applied. The search included randomised controlled trials that compared pulpotomy to root canal treatment for managing carious exposure in mature permanent teeth. Study selection: Studies were selected based on predetermined inclusion criteria: randomised controlled trials involving mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure, using hydraulic calcium silicate cements for pulpotomy. Non-comparative studies, case reports, and trials involving primary or immature permanent teeth were excluded. Data: Data were extracted on success rates, clinical outcomes, follow-up periods, pain profiles, and potential complications. A meta-analysis was performed, revealing no statistically significant differences in success rates between pulpotomy and RCT. Both interventions demonstrated success rates exceeding 90 % at one-year and two-year follow-up periods. Pain profiles consistently showed lower post-operative pain intensity in the pulpotomy group compared to the RCT group during the first week. Potential complications, such as non-responsive pulp and difficulties in determining pulp vitality, were reported more frequently in the pulpotomy group. Conclusions: Pulpotomy with bioactive hydraulic calcium silicate cements shows comparable success rates to RCT in managing carious pulp exposure in mature permanent teeth. The results suggest pulpotomy as a viable, less invasive alternative to RCT, particularly in cases where preservation of pulp vitality is paramount. Clinical significance: This systematic review highlights pulpotomy as a less invasive and cost-effective alternative to root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth. With comparable success rates and lower post-operative pain, pulpotomy offers a promising approach to managing carious exposure and preserving tooth vitality.
KW - Bioactive materials
KW - Carious pulp exposure
KW - Mature permanent teeth
KW - Pulpotomy
KW - Root canal treatment
KW - Vital pulp therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85205970277&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85205970277&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105392
DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105392
M3 - Article
C2 - 39369880
AN - SCOPUS:85205970277
SN - 0300-5712
VL - 150
JO - Journal of Dentistry
JF - Journal of Dentistry
M1 - 105392
ER -