TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of switching from olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone to aripiprazole on 10-year coronary heart disease risk and metabolic syndrome status
T2 - Results from a randomized controlled trial
AU - Stroup, T. Scott
AU - Byerly, Matthew J.
AU - Nasrallah, Henry A.
AU - Ray, Neepa
AU - Khan, Ahsan Y.
AU - Lamberti, J. Steven
AU - Glick, Ira D.
AU - Steinbook, Richard M.
AU - McEvoy, Joseph Patrick
AU - Hamer, Robert M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was funded by a grant from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) and by a contract from the National Institute of Mental Health (N01 MH900001). Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) provided aripiprazole and funds to FNIH in support of the study. FNIH, NIMH, and BMS were not involved in the conduct of the study, data analysis, or the preparation of this manuscript.
PY - 2013/5
Y1 - 2013/5
N2 - Purpose: This study examined the clinical significance of switching from olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone to aripiprazole by examining changes in predicted risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) according to the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and metabolic syndrome status. FRS estimates 10-year risk of "hard" coronary heart disease (CHD) outcomes (myocardial infarction and coronary death) while metabolic syndrome is associated with increased risk of CVD, stroke, and diabetes mellitus. Method: Changes in FRS and metabolic syndrome status were compared between patients with BMI ≥ 27 and non-HDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL randomly assigned to stay on stable current treatment (olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone) or switch to treatment with aripiprazole with 24. weeks of follow-up. All study participants were enrolled in a behavioral program that promoted healthy diet and exercise. Results: The pre-specified analyses included 89 switchers and 98 stayers who had post-baseline measurements needed to assess changes. Least squares mean estimates of 10-year CHD risk decreased more for the switch (from 7.0% to 5.2%) than the stay group (from 7.4% to 6.4%) (p = 0.0429). The odds ratio for having metabolic syndrome (stay vs. switch) at the last observation was 1.748 (95% CI 0.919, 3.324, p = 0.0885). Conclusion: Switching from olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone to aripiprazole was associated with larger reductions in predicted 10-year risk of CHD than the behavioral program alone. The advantage of switching on metabolic syndrome was not statistically significant. The benefits of switching must be balanced against its risks, which in this study included more discontinuations of the study treatment but no significant increase in symptoms or hospitalizations.
AB - Purpose: This study examined the clinical significance of switching from olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone to aripiprazole by examining changes in predicted risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) according to the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and metabolic syndrome status. FRS estimates 10-year risk of "hard" coronary heart disease (CHD) outcomes (myocardial infarction and coronary death) while metabolic syndrome is associated with increased risk of CVD, stroke, and diabetes mellitus. Method: Changes in FRS and metabolic syndrome status were compared between patients with BMI ≥ 27 and non-HDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL randomly assigned to stay on stable current treatment (olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone) or switch to treatment with aripiprazole with 24. weeks of follow-up. All study participants were enrolled in a behavioral program that promoted healthy diet and exercise. Results: The pre-specified analyses included 89 switchers and 98 stayers who had post-baseline measurements needed to assess changes. Least squares mean estimates of 10-year CHD risk decreased more for the switch (from 7.0% to 5.2%) than the stay group (from 7.4% to 6.4%) (p = 0.0429). The odds ratio for having metabolic syndrome (stay vs. switch) at the last observation was 1.748 (95% CI 0.919, 3.324, p = 0.0885). Conclusion: Switching from olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone to aripiprazole was associated with larger reductions in predicted 10-year risk of CHD than the behavioral program alone. The advantage of switching on metabolic syndrome was not statistically significant. The benefits of switching must be balanced against its risks, which in this study included more discontinuations of the study treatment but no significant increase in symptoms or hospitalizations.
KW - Antipsychotics
KW - Metabolic side effects
KW - Randomized clinical trial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875923896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875923896&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.schres.2013.01.013
DO - 10.1016/j.schres.2013.01.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 23434503
AN - SCOPUS:84875923896
SN - 0920-9964
VL - 146
SP - 190
EP - 195
JO - Schizophrenia Research
JF - Schizophrenia Research
IS - 1-3
ER -