TY - JOUR
T1 - Flexural strength and microhardness of bulk-fill restorative materials
AU - de Mendonça, Beatriz Curvello
AU - Soto-Montero, Jorge Rodrigo
AU - de Castro, Eduardo Fernandes
AU - Pecorari, Vanessa Gallego Arias
AU - Rueggeberg, Frederick Allen
AU - Giannini, Marcelo
N1 - Funding Information:
Coordena?~ao de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior, Grant/Award Number: 001; Funda?~ao de Amparo ? Pesquisa do Estado de S~ao Paulo, Grant/Award Number: #2017/04348-2; Universidad de Costa Rica, Grant/Award Number: #OAICE-047-2017.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: Bulk-fill materials can facilitate the restorative procedure mainly for deep and wide posterior cavities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate flexural strength (biaxial flexural strength [BFS]) and microhardness (Knoop microhardness [KHN]) at different depths of bulk-fill materials. Methods: Five bulk-fill materials were tested: two light-curable composite resins, one dual-cure composite, one bioactive restorative, and a high-viscosity glass ionomer. A conventional composite was used as control. BFS and KHN were tested at different depths. Data was analyzed by two- and one-way ANOVAs, respectively and Tukey's post-hoc (α=0.05). Results: The high-viscosity glass ionomer material presented the lowest BFS at all depths. KHN for the two light-curable and the dual-cure bulk-fill resin composites was reduced following an increase in restoration depth, while the conventional composite, the bioactive material, and the high-viscosity glass ionomer were not affected. Conclusion: There are differences in the properties of the tested materials at 4 mm depth, showing that the studied properties of some materials vary according to the cavity depth, although the results are material dependent. Clinical Significance: Mechanical properties of light-cured, bulk-fill materials may be affected by inadequate polymerization. Clinicians should consider complementary strategies to achieve adequate polymerization at high-increment depths.
AB - Background: Bulk-fill materials can facilitate the restorative procedure mainly for deep and wide posterior cavities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate flexural strength (biaxial flexural strength [BFS]) and microhardness (Knoop microhardness [KHN]) at different depths of bulk-fill materials. Methods: Five bulk-fill materials were tested: two light-curable composite resins, one dual-cure composite, one bioactive restorative, and a high-viscosity glass ionomer. A conventional composite was used as control. BFS and KHN were tested at different depths. Data was analyzed by two- and one-way ANOVAs, respectively and Tukey's post-hoc (α=0.05). Results: The high-viscosity glass ionomer material presented the lowest BFS at all depths. KHN for the two light-curable and the dual-cure bulk-fill resin composites was reduced following an increase in restoration depth, while the conventional composite, the bioactive material, and the high-viscosity glass ionomer were not affected. Conclusion: There are differences in the properties of the tested materials at 4 mm depth, showing that the studied properties of some materials vary according to the cavity depth, although the results are material dependent. Clinical Significance: Mechanical properties of light-cured, bulk-fill materials may be affected by inadequate polymerization. Clinicians should consider complementary strategies to achieve adequate polymerization at high-increment depths.
KW - dental materials
KW - light curing
KW - operative dentistry
KW - pediatric dentistry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102083653&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102083653&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jerd.12727
DO - 10.1111/jerd.12727
M3 - Article
C2 - 33675162
AN - SCOPUS:85102083653
SN - 1496-4155
VL - 33
SP - 628
EP - 635
JO - Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
JF - Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
IS - 4
ER -