TY - JOUR
T1 - Isavuconazole Versus Caspofungin in the Treatment of Candidemia and Other Invasive Candida Infections
T2 - The ACTIVE Trial
AU - Kullberg, Bart Jan
AU - Viscoli, Claudio
AU - Pappas, Peter G.
AU - Vazquez, Jose
AU - Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis
AU - Rotstein, Coleman
AU - Sobel, Jack D.
AU - Herbrecht, Raoul
AU - Rahav, Galia
AU - Jaruratanasirikul, Sutep
AU - Chetchotisakd, Ploenchan
AU - Van Wijngaerden, Eric
AU - De Waele, Jan
AU - Lademacher, Christopher
AU - Engelhardt, Marc
AU - Kovanda, Laura
AU - Croos-Dabrera, Rodney
AU - Fredericks, Christine
AU - Thompson, George R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Potential conflicts of interest. B. J. K. has received support from Astellas for being a member of the data review committee; from Amplyx, Basilea, Cidara, Gilead, and Scynexis for advisory board membership; and from Pfizer for speaker fees. G. R. T. has received grant and consultant fees from Astellas, Scynexis, and Cidara; grant support from Merck and Mayne; and consultant fees from Amplyx and Vical. J. V. has received support from Astellas for being a member of the data review committee. P. G. P. has received grant support from Astellas, T2 Biosystems, and Merck; and grant support and fees for Scientific Advisory Committee from Cidara. C. V. has received speaker fees and advisory board membership from Astellas, Pfizer, Gilead, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Angelini, and Basilea. L. O.-Z. has received support from Astellas for being a member of the data review committee; grant support and personal fees from Astellas, Pfizer, Cidara, and Scynexis; and personal fees from Merck, Gilead, and F2G. C. R. has received grant/research support from Astellas, Cidara, Chimerix Inc, Pfizer, and Merck; paid consultancy fees from Astellas, Merck, Pendopharm, and Pfizer; and speakers fees from Merck, Pfizer, Sunovion Pharmaceuticals, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. E. VW. has received study support to his institution from Astellas; educational grants from Merck and Pfizer; and has an advisory board membership from Pfizer. R. H. has received personal fees for advisory board membership and speakers fees from Basilea, Gilead, and MAS; advisory board membership for Astellas; and grant support, advisory board membership, and speakers fees from Pfizer. G. R. has received speakers fees and grant support from MSD and Pfizer. P. C. has received grant support from Astellas, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, the National Institutes of Health, and MSD. L. K., C. L., R. C.-D., and C. F. are employees of Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. M. E. is an employee of Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
Funding Information:
Acknowledgments. The authors thank Barrie J. Anthony, PhD, CMPP, of Envision Scientific Solutions, funded by Astellas Pharma, Inc., for editorial assistance. The authors thank the investigators and study center staff who conducted the studies for their contributions, as well as the patients who participated in the ACTIVE trial.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Author(s) 2018.
PY - 2019/6
Y1 - 2019/6
N2 - Background: Isavuconazole was compared to caspofungin followed by oral voriconazole in a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multinational clinical trial for the primary treatment of patients with candidemia or invasive candidiasis. Methods: Adult patients were randomized 1:1 to isavuconazole (200 mg intravenous [IV] three-times-daily [TID] for 2 days, followed by 200 mg IV once-daily [OD]) or caspofungin (70 mg IV OD on day 1, followed by 50 mg IV OD [70 mg in patients > 80 kg]) for a maximum of 56 days. After day 10, patients could switch to oral isavuconazole (isavuconazole arm) or voriconazole (caspofungin arm). Primary efficacy endpoint was successful overall response at the end of IV therapy (EOIVT) in patients with proven infections who received ≥1 dose of study drug (modified-intent-to-treat [mITT] population). The pre-specified noninferiority margin was 15%. Secondary outcomes in the mITT population were successful overall response at 2 weeks after the end of treatment, all-cause mortality at days 14 and 56, and safety. Results: Of 450 patients randomized, 400 comprised the mITT population. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Successful overall response at EOIVT was observed in 60.3% of patients in the isavuconazole arm and 71.1% in the caspofungin arm (adjusted difference -10.8, 95% confidence interval -19.9 - 1.8). The secondary endpoints, all-cause mortality, and safety were similar between arms. Median time to clearance of the bloodstream was comparable between groups. Conclusions: This study did not demonstrate non-inferiority of isavuconazole to caspofungin for primary treatment of invasive candidiasis. Secondary endpoints were similar between both groups. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00413218.
AB - Background: Isavuconazole was compared to caspofungin followed by oral voriconazole in a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multinational clinical trial for the primary treatment of patients with candidemia or invasive candidiasis. Methods: Adult patients were randomized 1:1 to isavuconazole (200 mg intravenous [IV] three-times-daily [TID] for 2 days, followed by 200 mg IV once-daily [OD]) or caspofungin (70 mg IV OD on day 1, followed by 50 mg IV OD [70 mg in patients > 80 kg]) for a maximum of 56 days. After day 10, patients could switch to oral isavuconazole (isavuconazole arm) or voriconazole (caspofungin arm). Primary efficacy endpoint was successful overall response at the end of IV therapy (EOIVT) in patients with proven infections who received ≥1 dose of study drug (modified-intent-to-treat [mITT] population). The pre-specified noninferiority margin was 15%. Secondary outcomes in the mITT population were successful overall response at 2 weeks after the end of treatment, all-cause mortality at days 14 and 56, and safety. Results: Of 450 patients randomized, 400 comprised the mITT population. Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. Successful overall response at EOIVT was observed in 60.3% of patients in the isavuconazole arm and 71.1% in the caspofungin arm (adjusted difference -10.8, 95% confidence interval -19.9 - 1.8). The secondary endpoints, all-cause mortality, and safety were similar between arms. Median time to clearance of the bloodstream was comparable between groups. Conclusions: This study did not demonstrate non-inferiority of isavuconazole to caspofungin for primary treatment of invasive candidiasis. Secondary endpoints were similar between both groups. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT00413218.
KW - Candida
KW - caspofungin
KW - isavuconazole
KW - voriconazole
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058147831&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058147831&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/cid/ciy827
DO - 10.1093/cid/ciy827
M3 - Article
C2 - 30289478
AN - SCOPUS:85058147831
SN - 1058-4838
VL - 68
SP - 1981
EP - 1989
JO - Clinical Infectious Diseases
JF - Clinical Infectious Diseases
IS - 12
M1 - ciy827
ER -