TY - JOUR
T1 - Medication nonadherence and treatment outcome in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder with suboptimal prior response
AU - Lindenmayer, Jean Pierre
AU - Liu-Seifert, Hong
AU - Kulkarni, Pandurang M.
AU - Kinon, Bruce J.
AU - Stauffer, Virginia
AU - Edwards, Sara E.
AU - Chen, Lei
AU - Adams, David H.
AU - Ascher-Svanum, Haya
AU - Buckley, Peter F.
AU - Citrome, Leslie
AU - Volavka, Jan
PY - 2009/7
Y1 - 2009/7
N2 - Objective: To examine the impact of medication nonadherence on treatment outcome in schizophrenia and potential risk factors for nonadherence. Method: A post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, 8-week, fixed-dose study comparing olanzapine 10, 20, and 40 mg/day for patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (DSM-IV criteria) with suboptimal response to current treatment (N = 599) was conducted between September 12, 2003, and November 3, 2005, at 55 study centers in the United States. Nonadherence was defined as not taking medication as prescribed based on daily pill counts. Because there was no significant difference in nonadherence between dose groups, effects of nonadherence on efficacy and safety outcomes were examined using all 3 groups combined. Baseline demographics and symptom severity were investigated as potential risk factors for nonadherence. Results: During the 8-week study, 34.5% of patients were nonadherent at least once. Nonadherent patients had significantly less improvement compared to adherent patients as measured by change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score (-22.57 vs. -26.84, p = .002). Longer duration of nonadherence was associated with reduced likelihood of treatment response (odds ratio = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90 to 0.99, p = .008). The early treatment discontinuation rate was higher in nonadherent compared to adherent patients (40.8% vs. 24.5%, p < .001). Adherent and nonadherent patients had comparable outcomes in most safety measures, except for weight change, for which adherent patients had greater weight gain than nonadherent patients (2.63 kg vs. 1.96 kg, p = .02). Greater depression severity at baseline (p = .01) and greater hostility level during the study were significant risk factors for nonadherence (p = .02). Conclusions: Medication nonadherence had a significantly negative impact on treatment response, highlighting the importance of adherence to achieve satisfactory treatment outcome. Findings may also help clinicians identify patients at risk for nonadherence and utilize interventions to improve adherence. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00100776.
AB - Objective: To examine the impact of medication nonadherence on treatment outcome in schizophrenia and potential risk factors for nonadherence. Method: A post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, 8-week, fixed-dose study comparing olanzapine 10, 20, and 40 mg/day for patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (DSM-IV criteria) with suboptimal response to current treatment (N = 599) was conducted between September 12, 2003, and November 3, 2005, at 55 study centers in the United States. Nonadherence was defined as not taking medication as prescribed based on daily pill counts. Because there was no significant difference in nonadherence between dose groups, effects of nonadherence on efficacy and safety outcomes were examined using all 3 groups combined. Baseline demographics and symptom severity were investigated as potential risk factors for nonadherence. Results: During the 8-week study, 34.5% of patients were nonadherent at least once. Nonadherent patients had significantly less improvement compared to adherent patients as measured by change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score (-22.57 vs. -26.84, p = .002). Longer duration of nonadherence was associated with reduced likelihood of treatment response (odds ratio = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.90 to 0.99, p = .008). The early treatment discontinuation rate was higher in nonadherent compared to adherent patients (40.8% vs. 24.5%, p < .001). Adherent and nonadherent patients had comparable outcomes in most safety measures, except for weight change, for which adherent patients had greater weight gain than nonadherent patients (2.63 kg vs. 1.96 kg, p = .02). Greater depression severity at baseline (p = .01) and greater hostility level during the study were significant risk factors for nonadherence (p = .02). Conclusions: Medication nonadherence had a significantly negative impact on treatment response, highlighting the importance of adherence to achieve satisfactory treatment outcome. Findings may also help clinicians identify patients at risk for nonadherence and utilize interventions to improve adherence. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00100776.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68049135880&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68049135880&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4088/JCP.08m04221
DO - 10.4088/JCP.08m04221
M3 - Article
C2 - 19497244
AN - SCOPUS:68049135880
SN - 0160-6689
VL - 70
SP - 990
EP - 996
JO - Diseases of the Nervous System
JF - Diseases of the Nervous System
IS - 7
ER -