TY - JOUR
T1 - Microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed with self-etching adhesives
AU - Brackett, William W.
AU - Haisch, Larry D.
AU - Pearce, Megan G.
AU - Brackett, Martha G.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by UNMC College of Dentistry Student Summer Research Fellowship FY03-05.
PY - 2004/1
Y1 - 2004/1
N2 - Statement of problem. Although they are widely available, there is insufficient information about the capability of self-etching adhesives in sealing the margins of resin composite restorations. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed using a strong pH self-etching adhesive, an intermediate pH self-etching adhesive, and an adhesive with a separate etchant and primer. Material and methods. Class V resin composite restorations (n = 8) were placed in prepared cavities in extracted human third molars using 2 self-etching dentin adhesives, Prompt L-Pop (Strong pH) or One-Up Bond F (Intermediate pH), and an adhesive with a separate etchant and primer, ScotchBond Multi-Purpose. The restored teeth received 1000 thermal cycles between 5°C and 55°C water baths with a 1-minute dwell time and were subsequently subjected to a methylene blue dye challenge and sectioned. The sectioned specimens were scored as demonstrating none, slight, or severe leakage (n=16). Ranked data were analyzed using a 1-way analysis of variance at a 5% confidence level. Results. The only leakage observed was along gingival margins, with an incidence of 31% for Prompt L-Pop and One-Up Bond F, and 50% for ScotchBond Multi-Purpose. Conclusion. No significant differences in marginal leakage were found among the adhesives tested.
AB - Statement of problem. Although they are widely available, there is insufficient information about the capability of self-etching adhesives in sealing the margins of resin composite restorations. Purpose. The purpose of this study was to compare the in vitro microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed using a strong pH self-etching adhesive, an intermediate pH self-etching adhesive, and an adhesive with a separate etchant and primer. Material and methods. Class V resin composite restorations (n = 8) were placed in prepared cavities in extracted human third molars using 2 self-etching dentin adhesives, Prompt L-Pop (Strong pH) or One-Up Bond F (Intermediate pH), and an adhesive with a separate etchant and primer, ScotchBond Multi-Purpose. The restored teeth received 1000 thermal cycles between 5°C and 55°C water baths with a 1-minute dwell time and were subsequently subjected to a methylene blue dye challenge and sectioned. The sectioned specimens were scored as demonstrating none, slight, or severe leakage (n=16). Ranked data were analyzed using a 1-way analysis of variance at a 5% confidence level. Results. The only leakage observed was along gingival margins, with an incidence of 31% for Prompt L-Pop and One-Up Bond F, and 50% for ScotchBond Multi-Purpose. Conclusion. No significant differences in marginal leakage were found among the adhesives tested.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346461395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346461395&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.10.003
DO - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.10.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 14739892
AN - SCOPUS:0346461395
SN - 0022-3913
VL - 91
SP - 42
EP - 45
JO - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
JF - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
IS - 1
ER -