TY - JOUR
T1 - Mogamulizumab in combination with durvalumab or tremelimumab in patients with advanced solid tumors
T2 - A Phase I Study
AU - Zamarin, Dmitriy
AU - Hamid, Omid
AU - Nayak-Kapoor, Asha
AU - Sahebjam, Solmaz
AU - Sznol, Mario
AU - Collaku, Agron
AU - Fox, Floyd E.
AU - Marshall, Margaret A.
AU - Hong, David S.
N1 - Funding Information:
D. Zamarin reports grants from Kyowa Kirin (institutional trial support) during the conduct of the study; grants from Genentech (institutional trial support), Merck (institutional trial support), and Astra Zeneca (institutional trial support), personal fees from Merck (advisory board), Western Oncolytics (consulting), and Agenus (consulting), and Bristol Myers Squibb (participated in non-CME course), and nonfinancial support from Genentech (sponsored travel) outside the submitted work, as well as patent for NDV as cancer therapeutic licensed to Merck. O. Hamid reports personal fees (consulting) from Aduro, Akeso, Amgen, Array, BeiGene, BMS, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Immunocore, Incyte, Janssen, Merck, NextCure, Novartis, Sanofi Regeneron, Seattle Genetics, Tempus, Zelluna, and personal fees (speaker) from Array, BMS, Novartis, and Sanofi Regeneron during the conduct of the study, as well as other (contracted research for institution) from Arcus, Aduro, Akeso, Amgen, Array, BMS, CytomX, Exelixis, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Immu-nocore, Incyte, Iovance, Merck, Moderna, Merck Serono, NextCure, Novartis, Sanofi Regeneron, Seattle Genetics, Torque, and Zelluna outside the submitted work. S. Sahebjam reports other from Kyowa Kirin (cost of conducting clinical trial at our center) during the conduct of the study; other from Merck (cost of investigator initiated clinical trial), Bristol Myers Squibb (cost of investigator initiated clinical trial), and Brooklyn ImmunoTherapeutics (cost of investigator initiated clinical trial), and personal fees from Merck (advisory board) and Eli Lilly (covering cost of trip to conference to present data) outside the submitted work, as well as owns stock at AbbVie in amount of less than $5,000. M. Sznol reports other from Genentech-Roche (consultant), Bristol-Myers Squibb (consultant), AstraZeneca/MedImmune (consultant), Pfizer (consultant), Novartis (consultant), Kyowa-Kirin (consultant), Seattle Genetics (consultant), Nektar (consultant), Pierre-Fabre (consultant), Lilly (consultant), Merck US (consultant), Theravance (consultant), Biodesix (consultant), Vac-cinex (consultant), Janssen/Johnson & Johnson (consultant), Modulate Therapeutics (consultant), Baxalta-Shire (consultant), Incyte (consultant), Newlink Genetics (consultant), Lion Biotechnologies (Iovance; consultant), AgonOx (consultant), Arbutus (consultant), Celldex (consultant), Inovio (consultant), Gritstone (consultant), Molecular Partners (consultant), Innate Pharma (consultant), AbbVie (consultant), Immunocore (consultant), Genmab (consultant), Almac (consultant), Hinge (consultant), Allakos (consultant), Anaeropharma (consultant), Array (consultant), GI Innovation (consultant), Genocea (consultant), Chugai-Roche (consultant), Zelluna (consultant), Alligator (consultant), Servier (consultant), Dragonfly (consultant), Verastem (consultant), Symphogen (consultant), Pieris (consultant), Omniox (consultant), Adaptimmune (consultant), Numab (consultant), Boehringer Ingelheim (consultant), Boston Pharmaceuticals (consultant), Agenus (consultant), BioNTech (consultant), Rubius (consultant), Amphivena (stock options only), Adaptive Biotechnologies (stock options only), Intensity (stock options only), Actym (stock options only), NextCure (stock options and consultant), Torque (stock options and consultant), and Nanobot (stock options only) outside the submitted work. A. Collaku reports employment with Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development during the conduct of the study. F.E. Fox reports other from Kyowa Kirin (employee) during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work. M.A. Marshall reports other from Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development (employee of sponsor) during the conduct of the study. D.S. Hong reports other from Kyowa-Kirin (funding for trial— institutional) during the conduct of the study, research/grant funding from AbbVie, Adaptimmune, Aldi-Norte, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Fate Therapeutics, Genentech, Genmab, GlaxoSmithKline, Ignyta, Infinity, Kite, Kyowa, Lilly, LOXO, Merck, MedImmune, Mirati, miRNA, Molecular Templates, Mologen, NCI-CTEP, Novartis, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, and Turning Point Therapeutics, travel, accommodations, and expenses from Bayer, LOXO, miRNA, Genmab, AACR, and ASCO, has SITC consulting or advisory role for Alpha Insights, Amgen, Axiom, Adaptimmune, Baxter, Bayer, eCancer, Genentech, GLG, Group H, Guidepoint, Infinity, Medscape, Numab, OncologyEducation ProjectAssociation, Pfizer, Prime Oncology, Takeda, Trieza Therapeutics, and WebMD, and has other ownership interests in Molecular Match (advisor), OncoResponse (founder), and Presagia Inc (advisor). No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other author.
Funding Information:
This study was sponsored by Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc. D. Zamarin was funded in part by the MSK Cancer Center Support grant of the NIH/NCI (P30CA008748). Medical writing and editorial support was provided by
Funding Information:
This study was sponsored by Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc. D. Zamarin was funded in part by the MSK Cancer Center Support grant of the NIH/NCI (P30CA008748). Medical writing and editorial support was provided by P.A. Todd of Tajut Ltd. and S.E. Johnson of S. E. Johnson Consulting, LLC, which was funded by Kyowa Kirin Pharmaceutical Development, Inc.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2020/9
Y1 - 2020/9
N2 - Purpose: The study goal was to determine safety, antitumor activity, and pharmacodynamic profile of mogamulizumab, an anti-C-C chemokine receptor 4 (anti-CCR4) mAb targeting effector regulatory T cells (eTreg), in combination with mAb checkpoint inhibitors durvalumab or tremelimumab. Patients and Methods: This was a multicenter, phase I, dose escalation study, followed by disease-specific cohort expansion (NCT02301130). Mogamulizumab dose escalation proceeded with concurrent dose escalation of durvalumab or tremelimumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cohort expansion occurred with mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg plus durvalumab 10 mg/kg or tremelimumab 10 mg/kg in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Results: Forty patients were enrolled during dose escalation, followed by 24 patients during dose expansion. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred during dose escalation. No new or unexpected toxicities were seen. Tolerability, the primary endpoint, was acceptable utilizing mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg plus durvalumab or tremelimumab 10 mg/kg in the combined dose escalation and dose expansion cohorts (each n ¼ 19). At these doses, the objective response rate was 5.3% (95% confidence interval, 0.1%-26.0%; one partial response) with each combination treatment. At all doses, mogamulizumab treatment led to almost complete depletion of peripheral eTregs, as well as reduction of intratumoral Tregs in the majority of patients. There was no clear correlation of clinical response with peripheral or intratumoral reduction in CCR4þ eTregs or with baseline degree of CCR4þ expression. Conclusions: Mogamulizumab in combination with durvalumab or tremelimumab did not result in potent antitumor efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Tolerability of mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg combined with durvalumab or tremelimumab 10 mg/kg was acceptable.
AB - Purpose: The study goal was to determine safety, antitumor activity, and pharmacodynamic profile of mogamulizumab, an anti-C-C chemokine receptor 4 (anti-CCR4) mAb targeting effector regulatory T cells (eTreg), in combination with mAb checkpoint inhibitors durvalumab or tremelimumab. Patients and Methods: This was a multicenter, phase I, dose escalation study, followed by disease-specific cohort expansion (NCT02301130). Mogamulizumab dose escalation proceeded with concurrent dose escalation of durvalumab or tremelimumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cohort expansion occurred with mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg plus durvalumab 10 mg/kg or tremelimumab 10 mg/kg in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Results: Forty patients were enrolled during dose escalation, followed by 24 patients during dose expansion. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred during dose escalation. No new or unexpected toxicities were seen. Tolerability, the primary endpoint, was acceptable utilizing mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg plus durvalumab or tremelimumab 10 mg/kg in the combined dose escalation and dose expansion cohorts (each n ¼ 19). At these doses, the objective response rate was 5.3% (95% confidence interval, 0.1%-26.0%; one partial response) with each combination treatment. At all doses, mogamulizumab treatment led to almost complete depletion of peripheral eTregs, as well as reduction of intratumoral Tregs in the majority of patients. There was no clear correlation of clinical response with peripheral or intratumoral reduction in CCR4þ eTregs or with baseline degree of CCR4þ expression. Conclusions: Mogamulizumab in combination with durvalumab or tremelimumab did not result in potent antitumor efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Tolerability of mogamulizumab 1 mg/kg combined with durvalumab or tremelimumab 10 mg/kg was acceptable.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091802467&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091802467&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0328
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0328
M3 - Article
C2 - 32586937
AN - SCOPUS:85091802467
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 26
SP - 4531
EP - 4541
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 17
ER -