TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient tolerance of in-office pulsed dye laser treatments to the upper aerodigestive tract
AU - Rees, Catherine J.
AU - Halum, Stacey L.
AU - Wijewickrama, Rohan C.
AU - Koufman, Jamie A.
AU - Postma, Gregory N.
PY - 2006/6
Y1 - 2006/6
N2 - Introduction: Recent advances in technology have facilitated a movement toward unsedated in-office treatment of laryngeal, tracheal, and esophageal lesions. The objective of this study was to determine patient tolerance of inoffice pulsed-dye laser (PDL) treatment of upper aerodigestive tract pathoses via the transnasal esophagoscope. Methods: Three hundred twenty-eight unsedated in-office PDL cases were performed at a university-based tertiary referral center in 131 patients. These procedures were performed for various upper aerodigestive pathoses, including recurrent respiratory papillomatosis, chronic granulomas, and recurrent leukoplakia. Eighty-nine subjects completed a phone survey concerning their discomfort level after the PDL procedure. They were also asked specific questions about recovery time, pain medication, and preference of operating room versus inoffice procedures. Results: The average comfort score was 7.4 (10 being minimal discomfort). Eighty-four percent did not use any pain medication; 87% stated that, if possible, they would prefer to undergo unsedated inoffice procedures rather than surgeries under general anesthesia for further treatment of their upper aerodigestive tract pathosis. Conclusions: Unsedated transnasal treatment of upper aerodigestive tract pathoses is readily accepted and well-tolerated by otolaryngology patients. Patients overwhelmingly prefer the inoffice PDL over surgeries under general anesthesia. EBM rating: C-4.
AB - Introduction: Recent advances in technology have facilitated a movement toward unsedated in-office treatment of laryngeal, tracheal, and esophageal lesions. The objective of this study was to determine patient tolerance of inoffice pulsed-dye laser (PDL) treatment of upper aerodigestive tract pathoses via the transnasal esophagoscope. Methods: Three hundred twenty-eight unsedated in-office PDL cases were performed at a university-based tertiary referral center in 131 patients. These procedures were performed for various upper aerodigestive pathoses, including recurrent respiratory papillomatosis, chronic granulomas, and recurrent leukoplakia. Eighty-nine subjects completed a phone survey concerning their discomfort level after the PDL procedure. They were also asked specific questions about recovery time, pain medication, and preference of operating room versus inoffice procedures. Results: The average comfort score was 7.4 (10 being minimal discomfort). Eighty-four percent did not use any pain medication; 87% stated that, if possible, they would prefer to undergo unsedated inoffice procedures rather than surgeries under general anesthesia for further treatment of their upper aerodigestive tract pathosis. Conclusions: Unsedated transnasal treatment of upper aerodigestive tract pathoses is readily accepted and well-tolerated by otolaryngology patients. Patients overwhelmingly prefer the inoffice PDL over surgeries under general anesthesia. EBM rating: C-4.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646799451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646799451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.01.019
DO - 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.01.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 16730550
AN - SCOPUS:33646799451
SN - 0194-5998
VL - 134
SP - 1023
EP - 1027
JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)
JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)
IS - 6
ER -