Predictive validity of IAT aggressiveness in the context of provocation

Juliette Richetin, Deborah South Richardson, Gregory D. Mason

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Scopus citations


This study examines the extent to which implicit measures of aggressiveness predict actual aggressive behavior in response to provocation. Participants (n = 77) completed implicit measures of aggressiveness, were or were not exposed to insult from an experimenter, evaluated the performance of the experimenter (i.e., opportunity for aggressive behavior), and completed explicit measures of aggressiveness. Results showed that the implicit measure of aggressiveness significantly predicted aggressive behavior in response to provocation, whereas it was not predictive when there was no provocation. The discussion deals with the validity of implicit measures as predictors of aggressive behavior and their moderators.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-34
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Psychology
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 2 2010


  • Aggression
  • IAT
  • Moderator of predictive validity
  • Provocation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Psychology(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Predictive validity of IAT aggressiveness in the context of provocation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this