Readmission after inferior vena cava filter placement for acute venous thromboembolism in the United States: Impact of a cancer diagnosis

Avirup Guha, Amit K. Dey, Grant McKinley, Rebecca R. Carter, P. Elliott Miller, Abhishek J. Deshmukh, Raja Zaghlol, Ana Barac, Nihar R. Desai, Daniel Addison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) use is common after a venous thromboembolic event (VTE). Cancer is associated with higher rates of VTEs and is also seen in a significant proportion of patients requiring IVCF. As hospital readmissions remain a frequently scrutinized metric, we sought to evaluate the impact of cancer on hospital-readmission rates and in-hospital outcomes among patients with VTEs who received an IVCF. Methods: Leveraging the 2013 to 2014 Nationwide Readmission Database, we identified adult patients presenting with a VTE in the United States and evaluated 30-day readmission rates and readmission in-hospital outcomes postindex-admission. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with readmission after an index-procedure, including traditional and nontraditional cardiovascular risk factors, as well as hospital-level characteristics. Results: Among the 619 241 patients presenting with a VTE at index-admission, 11.2% of patients received IVCF on index-admission, of which 30.9% had cancer. The 30-day readmission rate amongst IVCF recipients was 15.8% (N = 10 927), and 19.9% amongst those with cancer compared to 13.9% in patients without cancer (P
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2275-2278
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Cardiac Surgery
Volume35
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2020

Keywords

  • cancer
  • cardio-oncology
  • inferior vena cava filters
  • readmissions
  • venous thromboembolism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Readmission after inferior vena cava filter placement for acute venous thromboembolism in the United States: Impact of a cancer diagnosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this