Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients 80 years and older: a national database analysis of complications and mortality

Edward J. Testa, Daniel Yang, Michael J. Steflik, Brett D. Owens, Stephen A. Parada, Alan H. Daniels, Steven DeFroda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Although reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is considered a safe surgical option in elderly patients, large-scale analyses of complications and mortality after RSA in patients 80 years and older are scarce. The goals of the current study were to identify revision, complication, and early mortality rates after RSA in patients 80 years and older and compare these to younger patients. Methods: The PearlDiver Database, which contains services rendered to Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial insurance patients, was queried for patients undergoing RSA using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth/Tenth Revision (ICD-9/ICD-10) procedure codes. Patients were separated into 2 groups based on their age: 80 years and older and <80 years of age. The incidence of revision arthroplasty, medical, and surgical complications after RSA were extracted. Multivariate regression was used to compare revision arthroplasty and complication rates between groups. Statistical significance was set at P <.05. Results: A total of 29,430 cases of RSA were included, with 486 cases in patients 80 years and older (median age, 80 years; age range, 2 years). Patients 80 years and older had 1- and 2-year revision rates of 3.9% and 5.1%, compared with the younger cohort at 3.0% and 3.1%, respectively. In patients 80 years and older, there were higher rates of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (odds ratio [OR] 2.87, 95% CI 1.5-4.97), urinary tract infection (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.01-1.94), acute renal failure (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.44-3.17), and pneumonia (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.09-2.68) within 90 days postoperatively. Ninety-day surgical complications were similar between the cohorts; however, younger patients experienced higher rates of dislocation, stiffness, periprosthetic fracture, and implant complications 1 year postoperatively. Patients 80 years and older had a significantly higher 90-day mortality rate at 2.7% compared with 1.5% in younger patients (P =.002). Conclusions: RSA is a generally safe procedure even in patients 80 years and older, with low complication and revision rates. Patients 80 years and older had higher early mortality and medical complication rates, including DVT, renal failure, and pneumonia than patients <80 years of age. However, patients 80 years and older had lower rates of dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, and implant-related complication at 1 year postoperatively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S71-S77
JournalJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2022

Keywords

  • Level Ⅲ
  • Prognosis Study
  • Retrospective Cohort Comparison using Large Database
  • Shoulder
  • arthroplasty
  • complications
  • elderly
  • reverse
  • revision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients 80 years and older: a national database analysis of complications and mortality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this