TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety considerations in learning new procedures
T2 - a survey of surgeons
AU - Jaffe, Todd A.
AU - Hasday, Steven J.
AU - Knol, Meghan
AU - Pradarelli, Jason
AU - Quamme, Sudha R.Pavuluri
AU - Greenberg, Caprice C.
AU - Dimick, Justin B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - Background There exists a tension between surgical innovation and safety. The learning curve associated with the introduction of new procedures/technologies has been associated with preventable patient harm. Surgeon's perceptions regarding the safety of methods for learning new procedures/technologies are largely uncharacterized. Materials and methods A survey was designed to evaluate surgeons' perceptions related to learning new procedures/technologies. This included clinical vignettes across two domains: (1) experience with an operation (e.g., colectomy) and (2) experience with a technology (e.g., laparoscopy). This study also focuses on a surgeon's perceptions of existing credentialing/privileging requirements. Participants were faculty surgeons (n = 150) at two large Midwestern academic health centers. Results Survey response rate was 77% (116/150). 69% of respondents believed the processes of credentialing/privileging is “far too relaxed” or “too relaxed” for ensuring patient safety. Surgeons most commonly indicated a mini-fellowship is required to learn a new laparoscopic procedure. However, that requirement differed based on a surgeon's prior experience with laparoscopy. For example, to learn laparoscopic colectomy, 35% of respondents felt a surgeon with limited laparoscopic experience should complete a mini-fellowship, whereas 3% felt this was necessary if the surgeon had extensive laparoscopic experience. In the latter scenario, most respondents felt a surgeon should scrub in cases performed by an expert (38%) or perform cases under a proctor's supervision (33%) when learning laparoscopic colectomy. Conclusions Many surgeons believe existing hospital credentialing/privileging practices may be too relaxed. Moreover, surgeons believe the “one-size-fits-all” approach for training practicing surgeons may not protect patients from unsafe introduction of new procedures/technologies.
AB - Background There exists a tension between surgical innovation and safety. The learning curve associated with the introduction of new procedures/technologies has been associated with preventable patient harm. Surgeon's perceptions regarding the safety of methods for learning new procedures/technologies are largely uncharacterized. Materials and methods A survey was designed to evaluate surgeons' perceptions related to learning new procedures/technologies. This included clinical vignettes across two domains: (1) experience with an operation (e.g., colectomy) and (2) experience with a technology (e.g., laparoscopy). This study also focuses on a surgeon's perceptions of existing credentialing/privileging requirements. Participants were faculty surgeons (n = 150) at two large Midwestern academic health centers. Results Survey response rate was 77% (116/150). 69% of respondents believed the processes of credentialing/privileging is “far too relaxed” or “too relaxed” for ensuring patient safety. Surgeons most commonly indicated a mini-fellowship is required to learn a new laparoscopic procedure. However, that requirement differed based on a surgeon's prior experience with laparoscopy. For example, to learn laparoscopic colectomy, 35% of respondents felt a surgeon with limited laparoscopic experience should complete a mini-fellowship, whereas 3% felt this was necessary if the surgeon had extensive laparoscopic experience. In the latter scenario, most respondents felt a surgeon should scrub in cases performed by an expert (38%) or perform cases under a proctor's supervision (33%) when learning laparoscopic colectomy. Conclusions Many surgeons believe existing hospital credentialing/privileging practices may be too relaxed. Moreover, surgeons believe the “one-size-fits-all” approach for training practicing surgeons may not protect patients from unsafe introduction of new procedures/technologies.
KW - Continuing medical education
KW - Credentialing and privileging
KW - Minimally invasive surgery
KW - Quality
KW - Safety
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025123800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85025123800&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.058
DO - 10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.058
M3 - Article
C2 - 28985875
AN - SCOPUS:85025123800
SN - 0022-4804
VL - 218
SP - 361
EP - 366
JO - Journal of Surgical Research
JF - Journal of Surgical Research
ER -