TY - JOUR
T1 - Sensory adaptation training or escitalopram for ibswith constipation and rectal hypersensitivity
T2 - A randomized controlled trial
AU - Rao, Satish S.C.
AU - Coss-Adame, Enrique
AU - Yan, Yun
AU - Erdogan, Askin
AU - Valestin, Jessica
AU - Ayyala, Deepak Nag
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support: This work was supported by NIH grant R01 DK 57100-05 and grant RR00059 from the General Clinical Research Centers program, National Center for Research Resources to University of Iowa. The study was conducted at Augusta University Medical Center and the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, and data analysis and manuscript writing were completed at Augusta University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s).
PY - 2021/7/13
Y1 - 2021/7/13
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Rectal hypersensitivity is an important pathophysiological dysfunction in irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation (IBS-C), whose treatment remains challenging. In a randomized controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of a novel sensori-behavioral treatment, sensory adaptation training (SAT) with escitalopram. METHODS: Patients with IBS-C (Rome III) with rectal hypersensitivity received6 biweekly sessions of SAT or escitalopram 10mgdaily for 3months. SAT was performed by repetitive gradual distension of 10-cm long highly compliant rectal balloon above tolerability thresholds using barostat. Treatment effects on sensory thresholds and symptoms were compared. Coprimary outcome measures were those achieving improvements in rectal hypersensitivity ( 20% increase in 2/3 sensory thresholds) and pain ( 30% decrease). RESULTS: Werandomized 49 patients; 26 received SAT and23 escitalopram. SAT significantly improved desire to defecate (D 13.562.3 vs 2.261.1mmHg, P50.0006) and maximum tolerability (D 14.861.9 vs 1.6 6 0.9 mm Hg, P < 0.0001) thresholds compared with escitalopram. There were significantly greater percentage of hypersensitivity responders with SAT than escitalopram (69% vs 17%, P < 0.001), but not pain responders (58%vs44%, P50.4). Daily pain scores did not differ between groups (P 5 0.8) or escitalopram (P 5 0.06) but decreased with SAT (P 5 0.0046) compared with baseline. SAT significantly increased rectal compliance (P < 0.019) and complete spontaneous bowel movements per week than escitalopram (P 5 0.04). Five withdrew from adverse events with escitalopram and none with SAT. DISCUSSION: SAT was significantly more efficacious in improving hypersensitivity and bowel symptoms in IBS-C than escitalopram. SAT is a promising novel treatment for IBS with rectal hypersensitivity.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Rectal hypersensitivity is an important pathophysiological dysfunction in irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation (IBS-C), whose treatment remains challenging. In a randomized controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of a novel sensori-behavioral treatment, sensory adaptation training (SAT) with escitalopram. METHODS: Patients with IBS-C (Rome III) with rectal hypersensitivity received6 biweekly sessions of SAT or escitalopram 10mgdaily for 3months. SAT was performed by repetitive gradual distension of 10-cm long highly compliant rectal balloon above tolerability thresholds using barostat. Treatment effects on sensory thresholds and symptoms were compared. Coprimary outcome measures were those achieving improvements in rectal hypersensitivity ( 20% increase in 2/3 sensory thresholds) and pain ( 30% decrease). RESULTS: Werandomized 49 patients; 26 received SAT and23 escitalopram. SAT significantly improved desire to defecate (D 13.562.3 vs 2.261.1mmHg, P50.0006) and maximum tolerability (D 14.861.9 vs 1.6 6 0.9 mm Hg, P < 0.0001) thresholds compared with escitalopram. There were significantly greater percentage of hypersensitivity responders with SAT than escitalopram (69% vs 17%, P < 0.001), but not pain responders (58%vs44%, P50.4). Daily pain scores did not differ between groups (P 5 0.8) or escitalopram (P 5 0.06) but decreased with SAT (P 5 0.0046) compared with baseline. SAT significantly increased rectal compliance (P < 0.019) and complete spontaneous bowel movements per week than escitalopram (P 5 0.04). Five withdrew from adverse events with escitalopram and none with SAT. DISCUSSION: SAT was significantly more efficacious in improving hypersensitivity and bowel symptoms in IBS-C than escitalopram. SAT is a promising novel treatment for IBS with rectal hypersensitivity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111554253&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111554253&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000381
DO - 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000381
M3 - Article
C2 - 34254966
AN - SCOPUS:85111554253
SN - 2155-384X
VL - 12
JO - Clinical and translational gastroenterology
JF - Clinical and translational gastroenterology
IS - 7
M1 - e00381
ER -