Sequential Immune Responses: The Weapons of Immunity

Charles D. Mills, Klaus Ley, Kurt Buchmann, Johnathan Canton

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

Sequential immune responses (SIR) is a new model that describes what 'immunity' means in higher animals. Existing models, such as self/nonself discrimination or danger, focus on how immune responses are initiated. However, initiation is not protection. SIR describes the actual immune responses that provide protection. SIR resulted from a comprehensive analysis of the evolution of immune systems that revealed that several very different types of host innate responses occur (and at different tempos) which together provide host protection. SIR1 uses rapidly activated enzymes like the NADPH oxidases and is present in all animal cells. SIR2 is mediated by the first 'immune' cells: macrophage-like cells. SIR3 evolved in animals like invertebrates and provides enhanced protection through advanced macrophage recognition and killing of pathogens and through other innate immune cells such as neutrophils. Finally, in vertebrates, macrophages developed SIR4: the ability to present antigens to T cells. Though much slower than SIR1-3, adaptive responses provide a unique new protection for higher vertebrates. Importantly, newer SIR responses were added on top of older, evolutionarily conserved functions to provide 'layers' of host protection. SIR transcends existing models by elucidating the different weapons of immunity that provide host protection in higher animals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)443-449
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Innate Immunity
Volume7
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 25 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Danger
  • Evolution
  • Innate immunity
  • M1
  • M2
  • Macrophages
  • NADPHox
  • Nox
  • Self/nonself
  • Th1
  • Th2

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sequential Immune Responses: The Weapons of Immunity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this