TY - JOUR
T1 - Situational variations of blood pressure in ambulatory hypertensive patients
AU - Harshfield, Gregory A
AU - Pickering, T. G.
AU - Kleinert, H. D.
AU - Blank, S.
AU - Laragh, J. H.
PY - 1982/1/1
Y1 - 1982/1/1
N2 - Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at 15-min intervals for 24 h in 60 untreated patients with uncomplicated mild essential hypertension using a new automatic noninvasive portable recorder. During the recording, the patients went about their normal daily routine, of which they kept a detailed record. The data were analyzed for five different recording situations: in the clinic, at work, at home, asleep, and average of the entire 24-hr period. Twenty-four hour readings were also compared with previously obtained casual readings. Clinic readings were correlated with the average 24-hr values, but for individual patients clinic pressures were relatively poor predictors of 24-hr pressures. Pressures recorded in the clinic were also greater than average 24-hr values. Similar degrees of correlation were found between clinic, home, work, and sleep pressures. Pressures recorded in the clinic were similar to pressures at work but higher than at home or asleep. In contrast, heart rate was similar in all conditions except during sleep, when it was lower. Previously measured casual pressures were also correlated with the clinic readings, with systolic values being similar, but diastolic values higher in the clinic during the 24-hr recording. For patients with clinic diastolic pressures in the range 90-104 mm Hg, 24-hr pressures varied from 75 to 100 mm Hg. We conclude that pressures measured casually in the clinic do not accurately reflect average 24-hr pressures and that ambulatory recording is helpful in the evaluation of mildly hypertensive patients.
AB - Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at 15-min intervals for 24 h in 60 untreated patients with uncomplicated mild essential hypertension using a new automatic noninvasive portable recorder. During the recording, the patients went about their normal daily routine, of which they kept a detailed record. The data were analyzed for five different recording situations: in the clinic, at work, at home, asleep, and average of the entire 24-hr period. Twenty-four hour readings were also compared with previously obtained casual readings. Clinic readings were correlated with the average 24-hr values, but for individual patients clinic pressures were relatively poor predictors of 24-hr pressures. Pressures recorded in the clinic were also greater than average 24-hr values. Similar degrees of correlation were found between clinic, home, work, and sleep pressures. Pressures recorded in the clinic were similar to pressures at work but higher than at home or asleep. In contrast, heart rate was similar in all conditions except during sleep, when it was lower. Previously measured casual pressures were also correlated with the clinic readings, with systolic values being similar, but diastolic values higher in the clinic during the 24-hr recording. For patients with clinic diastolic pressures in the range 90-104 mm Hg, 24-hr pressures varied from 75 to 100 mm Hg. We conclude that pressures measured casually in the clinic do not accurately reflect average 24-hr pressures and that ambulatory recording is helpful in the evaluation of mildly hypertensive patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019996011&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019996011&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00006842-198207000-00002
DO - 10.1097/00006842-198207000-00002
M3 - Article
C2 - 7134362
AN - SCOPUS:0019996011
SN - 0003-1348
VL - 44
SP - 237
EP - 245
JO - Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience
JF - Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience
IS - 3
ER -