Abstract
Technology is often touted as the savior of education (Collins & Haverson, 2009). However, is technology the panacea that it is made out to be? This paper is an extended conversation among a group of faculty members at three different universities and their attitudes and beliefs about technology and education. Three professors shared their pro-technology stance and three took a less favorable view. The contents of the conversation were then analyzed by a neutral party to extract the various themes that emerged. What was discovered was that were three major threads to the conversation: technology and educational access, online education, and technology and instructional strategies. While there was little agreement, throughout the evolution of the conversation, both sides began to understand each other a little more.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 6 |
| Journal | Qualitative Report |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| State | Published - Jan 20 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Equity
- Online Learning
- Pedagogy
- Technology
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Cultural Studies
- Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Technology and teaching: A conversation among faculty regarding the pros and cons of technology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS