Abstract
If greater inequality results in greater saving which leads to greater investment and growth, then government policies which increase inequality promote growth; this is called the antiequality argument. If, however, greater equality produces more consumption which drives investment and growth, then increasing equality produces growth; this is the pro-equality argument. This essay tests the assumptions behind the anti- and pro-equality arguments. These assumptions are tested using a Two Stage Least Squares procedure on household and corporate data for Korea between 1963 and 1980.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 49-71 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | The Journal of Development Studies |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 1 1992 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Development
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Compatibility of Growth and Increased Equality: Korea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS