TY - JOUR
T1 - The Decision-Making Process of Young Adult Women with Cancer Who Considered Fertility Cryopreservation
AU - Hershberger, Patricia E.
AU - Finnegan, Lorna
AU - Pierce, Penny F.
AU - Scoccia, Bert
N1 - Funding Information:
Funded by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the Office of Research on Women's Health (Grant #K12 HD055892) and by the University of Michigan Office of the Vice President for Research.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Objective: To provide an in-depth description of the decision-making process that women who are diagnosed with cancer undergo as they decide whether to accept or decline fertility cryopreservation. Design: A qualitative, grounded theory approach. Setting and Participants: Twenty-seven women (mean age = 29 years) who were diagnosed with cancer and were eligible for egg, embryo, or ovarian tissue cryopreservation were recruited from the Internet and two university centers. Methods: Each woman participated in a semistructured interview by phone (n = 21) or e-mail (n = 6). Data were analyzed using the constant-comparative method to inductively ascertain the women's decision-making process. NVivo 8 software was used to assist with data retrieval and analysis. Results: The decision-making process consists of four major phases that women experience to actively formulate a decision: identify, contemplate, resolve, and engage. In the identify phase, women acquire knowledge and experience a "double hit" scenario that is often devastating. Within the contemplate phase, five interrelated dimensions emerged including constructing and/or endorsing preferences and values and undergoing decisional debriefing sessions. A decision is reached in the resolve phase and carried out in the engage phase. Among the participants, 14 declined fertility cryopreservation and 13 accepted egg and/or embryo cryopreservation. Conclusion: The descriptive theoretical framework clarifies the underlying processes that women with cancer undergo to decide about fertility cryopreservation. Quality of care for women with cancer can be improved by implementing appropriately timed information and tailored developmental and contextual counseling to support decision making.
AB - Objective: To provide an in-depth description of the decision-making process that women who are diagnosed with cancer undergo as they decide whether to accept or decline fertility cryopreservation. Design: A qualitative, grounded theory approach. Setting and Participants: Twenty-seven women (mean age = 29 years) who were diagnosed with cancer and were eligible for egg, embryo, or ovarian tissue cryopreservation were recruited from the Internet and two university centers. Methods: Each woman participated in a semistructured interview by phone (n = 21) or e-mail (n = 6). Data were analyzed using the constant-comparative method to inductively ascertain the women's decision-making process. NVivo 8 software was used to assist with data retrieval and analysis. Results: The decision-making process consists of four major phases that women experience to actively formulate a decision: identify, contemplate, resolve, and engage. In the identify phase, women acquire knowledge and experience a "double hit" scenario that is often devastating. Within the contemplate phase, five interrelated dimensions emerged including constructing and/or endorsing preferences and values and undergoing decisional debriefing sessions. A decision is reached in the resolve phase and carried out in the engage phase. Among the participants, 14 declined fertility cryopreservation and 13 accepted egg and/or embryo cryopreservation. Conclusion: The descriptive theoretical framework clarifies the underlying processes that women with cancer undergo to decide about fertility cryopreservation. Quality of care for women with cancer can be improved by implementing appropriately timed information and tailored developmental and contextual counseling to support decision making.
KW - Decision research
KW - Family planning
KW - Fertility preservation
KW - Oncofertility
KW - Qualitative research
KW - Survivorship
KW - Theory development
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872408448&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872408448&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01426.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2012.01426.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 23167639
AN - SCOPUS:84872408448
SN - 0884-2175
VL - 42
SP - 59
EP - 69
JO - JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing
JF - JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing
IS - 1
ER -