TY - JOUR
T1 - The importance of modeling method effects
T2 - Resolving the (Uni)dimensionality of the Loneliness Questionnaire
AU - Ebesutani, Chad
AU - Drescher, Christopher F.
AU - Reise, Steven P.
AU - Heiden, Laurie
AU - Hight, Terry L.
AU - Damon, John D.
AU - Young, John
PY - 2012/3/1
Y1 - 2012/3/1
N2 - This study sought to resolve the dimensionality of the Loneliness Questionnaire (LQ; Asher, Hymel, & Renshaw, 1984) by applying recommended confirmatory factor analytic procedures that control for method effects (Brown, 2003). This study was needed given that inconsistent findings have been reported recently regarding the structure of this instrument (Bagner, Storch, & Roberti, 2004) and all models to date have not accounted for method effects due to the non-reversed-worded and reversed-worded items of this instrument. Using a large sample of youth in Grades 2 through 12 (N = 11,725), we compared the previously reported 1- and 2-factor models with a newly posited 1-factor model that incorporated correlated error terms to account for method effects. We found that the 1-factor model that included correlated error terms fit the data best, and that this factor structure evidenced measurement invariance across boys and girls in childhood, but not in adolescence. The meaning of the LQ indicators was also consistent for boys across development, but evidenced differences for girls in childhood versus adolescence. More generally, it was demonstrated that modeling method effects is vital to accurately understanding the dimensionality of loneliness when reversed-worded and non-reversed-worded items are used as indicators. The measurement and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
AB - This study sought to resolve the dimensionality of the Loneliness Questionnaire (LQ; Asher, Hymel, & Renshaw, 1984) by applying recommended confirmatory factor analytic procedures that control for method effects (Brown, 2003). This study was needed given that inconsistent findings have been reported recently regarding the structure of this instrument (Bagner, Storch, & Roberti, 2004) and all models to date have not accounted for method effects due to the non-reversed-worded and reversed-worded items of this instrument. Using a large sample of youth in Grades 2 through 12 (N = 11,725), we compared the previously reported 1- and 2-factor models with a newly posited 1-factor model that incorporated correlated error terms to account for method effects. We found that the 1-factor model that included correlated error terms fit the data best, and that this factor structure evidenced measurement invariance across boys and girls in childhood, but not in adolescence. The meaning of the LQ indicators was also consistent for boys across development, but evidenced differences for girls in childhood versus adolescence. More generally, it was demonstrated that modeling method effects is vital to accurately understanding the dimensionality of loneliness when reversed-worded and non-reversed-worded items are used as indicators. The measurement and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859731082&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859731082&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00223891.2011.627967
DO - 10.1080/00223891.2011.627967
M3 - Article
C2 - 22339311
AN - SCOPUS:84859731082
SN - 0022-3891
VL - 94
SP - 186
EP - 195
JO - Journal of Personality Assessment
JF - Journal of Personality Assessment
IS - 2
ER -