TY - JOUR
T1 - The Model Fidelity Hierarchy
T2 - From Text to Conceptual, Computational, and Executable Model
AU - Levi-Soskin, Natali
AU - Jbara, Ahmad
AU - Dori, Dov
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received November 5, 2019; revised March 19, 2020 and June 1, 2020; accepted June 26, 2020. Date of publication August 3, 2020; date of current version March 9, 2021. This work was supported by the Gordon Center for Systems Engineering at the Technion, under Grant 2026780. (Corresponding author: Natali Levi-Soskin.) Natali Levi-Soskin and Ahmad Jbara are with the William Davidson Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel (e-mail: natali.levi@campus.technion.ac.il; ahmadjbara@gmail.com).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2007-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Model-based systems engineering applies a variety of model kinds, each with its own fidelity and exactness level. Based on experience we gained while modeling an aircraft landing gear with the objective of numerically defining its various parameters that fulfill engineering and safety requirements, we present the model fidelity hierarchy (MFH). At this hierarchy's bottom, vaguest level, is spoken language, followed by free written text, conceptual model, its augmentation with computational capabilities, and finally an executable version of that model. Using object-process methodology (OPM ISO 19450) with its computational extension, we present this hierarchy by describing the landing gear model as it progresses through these levels, and the kinds of mistakes revealed while transitioning from one level to the next. The MFH, identified and defined in this article, is made possible by using OPM, which enables these level transitions to be information lossless, providing the most value while requiring the minimal effort. The ability of this continuous, seamless modeling approach to detect errors with increasing accuracy justifies our OPM approach, as errors revealed in this early system lifecycle stage are exponentially less costly to correct than those revealed downstream.
AB - Model-based systems engineering applies a variety of model kinds, each with its own fidelity and exactness level. Based on experience we gained while modeling an aircraft landing gear with the objective of numerically defining its various parameters that fulfill engineering and safety requirements, we present the model fidelity hierarchy (MFH). At this hierarchy's bottom, vaguest level, is spoken language, followed by free written text, conceptual model, its augmentation with computational capabilities, and finally an executable version of that model. Using object-process methodology (OPM ISO 19450) with its computational extension, we present this hierarchy by describing the landing gear model as it progresses through these levels, and the kinds of mistakes revealed while transitioning from one level to the next. The MFH, identified and defined in this article, is made possible by using OPM, which enables these level transitions to be information lossless, providing the most value while requiring the minimal effort. The ability of this continuous, seamless modeling approach to detect errors with increasing accuracy justifies our OPM approach, as errors revealed in this early system lifecycle stage are exponentially less costly to correct than those revealed downstream.
KW - Error detection
KW - landing gear
KW - model execution
KW - model fidelity hierarchy (MFH)
KW - model-based systems engineering (MBSE)
KW - software engineering
KW - system modeling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102739728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102739728&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/JSYST.2020.3008857
DO - 10.1109/JSYST.2020.3008857
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85102739728
SN - 1932-8184
VL - 15
SP - 1287
EP - 1298
JO - IEEE Systems Journal
JF - IEEE Systems Journal
IS - 1
M1 - 9154747
ER -