Theophylline improves esophageal chest pain - A randomized, placebo-controlled study

Satish S.C. Rao, Ranjit S. Mudipalli, Jose M. Remes-Troche, Craig L. Utech, Bridget Zimmerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AIM: The treatment of esophageal (noncardiac) chest pain is unsatisfactory and there is no approved therapy. A previous uncontrolled study suggested that theophylline may be useful. Our aims were to investigate the effects of theophylline on esophageal sensorimotor function and chest pain. METHODS: In a double-blind study, sensory and biomechanical properties of the esophagus were assessed using impedance planimetry in 16 patients with esophageal hypersensitivity, after intravenous theophylline or placebo. In a second, randomized 4-wk crossover study, oral theophylline and placebo were administered to 24 patients with esophageal hypersensitivity. Frequency, intensity, and duration of chest pain episodes were evaluated. RESULTS: After IV theophylline, chest pain thresholds (P = 0.027) and esophageal cross-sectional area (P = 0.03) increased and the esophageal wall became more distensible (P = 0.04) compared with placebo. After oral theophylline, the number of painful days (P = 0.03) and chest pain episodes (P = 0.025), pain duration (P = 0.002), and its severity (P = 0.031) decreased. Overall symptoms improved in 58% on theophylline and 6% on placebo (P < 0.02). There was no order effect. CONCLUSIONS: Theophylline relaxed the esophageal wall, decreased hypersensitivity, and improved chest pain. Theophylline is effective in the treatment of functional chest pain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)930-938
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology
Volume102
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Theophylline improves esophageal chest pain - A randomized, placebo-controlled study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this