Thresholds for significant decrease in hemodialysis access blood flow

Sunanda J. Ram, Raja Nassar, Rashid Sharaf, Alberto Magnasco, Steven A. Jones, William D. Paulson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations


During hemodialysis access surveillance, referral for evaluation and correction of stenosis is based upon determination that a significant decrease in blood flow (Q) has occurred. However, criteria for determining when a decrease is statistically significant have not yet been established. In this study we established such criteria by analyzing Q variation with the glucose pump test (GPT). We took nine Q measurements in each of 25 patients (18 grafts, 7 fistulas) during three dialysis sessions within a 2-week period (predialysis and during hours 1 and 3). We determined thresholds that define a significant percentage decrease in Q (ΔQ) for various p values. In order to confirm the general applicability of these thresholds, we computed the average within-patient Q variation during the three sessions (computed as a coefficient of variation and referred to as short-term variation). We then determined the relative influences of biological (true) variation and analytical error on short-term variation. We found that ΔQ must be > 33% to be significant at p < 0.05, whereas the threshold is > 17% for p < 0.20. Measuring Q at uniform versus different times during the sessions did not significantly reduce these thresholds. We also found that biological variation was nearly as large as short-term Q variation, whereas analytical error contributed minimally to short-term variation. In conclusion, this study defines thresholds for a significant ΔQ that have wide application in determining access referral for evaluation and correction of stenosis. Selection of a particular threshold should consider the relative importance of avoiding thrombosis versus avoiding unnecessary procedures. If avoiding unnecessary procedures is a priority, then we recommend a threshold of > 33%. These thresholds apply to other methods of measuring Q, provided analytical error is significantly less than biological variation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)558-564
Number of pages7
JournalSeminars in dialysis
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology


Dive into the research topics of 'Thresholds for significant decrease in hemodialysis access blood flow'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this