TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding molecular testing uptake across tumor types in eight countries
T2 - Results from a multinational cross-sectional survey
AU - Chambers, Pinkie
AU - Man, Kenneth K.C.
AU - Lui, Vivian W.Y.
AU - Mpima, Sheila
AU - Nasuti, Paola
AU - Forster, Martin D.
AU - Wong, Ian C.K.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the IQVIA analytical team for the aggregation and supply of the survey data used for the analyses in this study. We thank Peter Forbes, Royal Literary Fund project Fellow at University College London Hospitals, for his advice throughout the manuscript preparation process. M.D.F. is supported by the UCL/UCLH NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. P.C. is funded by the National Institute for Health Research Academy (project reference No. DRF 2017-10-016). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, NIHR, or the Department of Health.
Funding Information:
K.K.C.M. is funded by the C W Maplethorpe Fellowship. V.W.Y.L. is funded by the Research Grant Council, Hong Kong (General Research Fund: 17114814, 17121616, 14168517, and Research Impact Fund R4017-18); the Health and Medical Research Fund (HMRF#15160691, the Health and Medical Research Fund, the Food and Health Bureau, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region); University-Industry Collaboration Program
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - PURPOSE The growth in understanding of molecular biology and genomics has augmented the development of targeted cancer treatments; however, challenges exist in access to molecular testing, an essential precursor to treatment decision-making. We used data from a cross-sectional survey to evaluate the differences in uptake of molecular testing, METHODS Using the aggregated results of a questionnaire developed and distributed to clinicians by IQVIA, including treatment details and investigations undertaken for patients, we compared proportions of patients receiving molecular testing and targeted treatment by cancer type for the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Japan, and China. We used multivariable logistic regression methods to understand the effect of country on the odds of receiving a molecular test. RESULTS There was a total of 61,491 cases. Across countries and cancer types, uptake rates for molecular testing ranged between 2% and 98%, with the greatest differences seen in gastric cancers (range, 23% to 70%), and significant variations were observed for both European and Asian countries. China consistently demonstrated a significantly reduced uptake for all molecular tests assessed; however; uptake of drug treatment in gastric cancers after testing positive for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene was higher than in some European countries (China, 85%; European range, 8% to 66%). The uptake of epidermal growth factor receptor gene testing was greater in some Asian countries relative to the United Kingdom, where incidence of lung cancer is higher (Japan: odds ratio, 3.1 [95% CI, 2.6 to 3.8]; South Korea: odds ratio, 2.7 [95% CI, 2 to 3.4]). CONCLUSION We have highlighted inequity in access to molecular testing and subsequent treatments across countries, which warrants improvements.
AB - PURPOSE The growth in understanding of molecular biology and genomics has augmented the development of targeted cancer treatments; however, challenges exist in access to molecular testing, an essential precursor to treatment decision-making. We used data from a cross-sectional survey to evaluate the differences in uptake of molecular testing, METHODS Using the aggregated results of a questionnaire developed and distributed to clinicians by IQVIA, including treatment details and investigations undertaken for patients, we compared proportions of patients receiving molecular testing and targeted treatment by cancer type for the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Japan, and China. We used multivariable logistic regression methods to understand the effect of country on the odds of receiving a molecular test. RESULTS There was a total of 61,491 cases. Across countries and cancer types, uptake rates for molecular testing ranged between 2% and 98%, with the greatest differences seen in gastric cancers (range, 23% to 70%), and significant variations were observed for both European and Asian countries. China consistently demonstrated a significantly reduced uptake for all molecular tests assessed; however; uptake of drug treatment in gastric cancers after testing positive for the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene was higher than in some European countries (China, 85%; European range, 8% to 66%). The uptake of epidermal growth factor receptor gene testing was greater in some Asian countries relative to the United Kingdom, where incidence of lung cancer is higher (Japan: odds ratio, 3.1 [95% CI, 2.6 to 3.8]; South Korea: odds ratio, 2.7 [95% CI, 2 to 3.4]). CONCLUSION We have highlighted inequity in access to molecular testing and subsequent treatments across countries, which warrants improvements.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089360084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85089360084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JOP.19.00507
DO - 10.1200/JOP.19.00507
M3 - Article
C2 - 32160136
AN - SCOPUS:85089360084
SN - 2688-1527
VL - 16
SP - E770-E778
JO - JCO Oncology Practice
JF - JCO Oncology Practice
IS - 8
ER -