TY - JOUR
T1 - Vaginal micronized progesterone versus intramuscular progesterone for luteal support in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
AU - Mitwally, Mohamed F.
AU - Diamond, Michael P.
AU - Abuzeid, Mostafa
PY - 2010/1/15
Y1 - 2010/1/15
N2 - Objective: To study the outcome of IVF-ET in women who used vaginal P (vaginal P4) versus those who used P in oil via IM injection (IM-P4) for luteal support. Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: Tertiary referral infertility center. Patient(s): A cohort of 544 women. Intervention(s): In 145 women, vaginal P4 was used, while in 399 women, IM-P4 was used for luteal support. Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes included other IVF-ET outcomes: rates of clinical pregnancy and pregnancy loss (chemical and miscarriage) and serum P levels during the luteal phase and early pregnancy. Result(s): Women who used vaginal P4 for luteal support had ongoing pregnancy rates (odds ratio [OR], 1.0675; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7587-1.5020) and rates of total pregnancy loss (OR, 1.0775; 95% CI, 0.7383-1.5727) that were not statistically different from those who used IM-P4. During the luteal phase, women who used vaginal P4 had mean serum P levels that were not statistically different from those who used IM-P4. However, during early pregnancy, mean P levels in pregnant women who used vaginal P4 were statistically significantly higher. Conclusion(s): In women undergoing IVF-ET according to the GnRH agonist long protocol, luteal support with vaginal P4 was associated with treatment outcomes that were no different from those associated with IM-P4 luteal support.
AB - Objective: To study the outcome of IVF-ET in women who used vaginal P (vaginal P4) versus those who used P in oil via IM injection (IM-P4) for luteal support. Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting: Tertiary referral infertility center. Patient(s): A cohort of 544 women. Intervention(s): In 145 women, vaginal P4 was used, while in 399 women, IM-P4 was used for luteal support. Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes included other IVF-ET outcomes: rates of clinical pregnancy and pregnancy loss (chemical and miscarriage) and serum P levels during the luteal phase and early pregnancy. Result(s): Women who used vaginal P4 for luteal support had ongoing pregnancy rates (odds ratio [OR], 1.0675; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7587-1.5020) and rates of total pregnancy loss (OR, 1.0775; 95% CI, 0.7383-1.5727) that were not statistically different from those who used IM-P4. During the luteal phase, women who used vaginal P4 had mean serum P levels that were not statistically different from those who used IM-P4. However, during early pregnancy, mean P levels in pregnant women who used vaginal P4 were statistically significantly higher. Conclusion(s): In women undergoing IVF-ET according to the GnRH agonist long protocol, luteal support with vaginal P4 was associated with treatment outcomes that were no different from those associated with IM-P4 luteal support.
KW - IM-P
KW - in vitro fertilization
KW - luteal support
KW - micronized vaginal progesterone
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74449093910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=74449093910&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.047
DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.047
M3 - Article
C2 - 19362305
AN - SCOPUS:74449093910
SN - 0015-0282
VL - 93
SP - 554
EP - 569
JO - Fertility and sterility
JF - Fertility and sterility
IS - 2
ER -