Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

30-Day Outcomes After Intraoperative Leak Testing for Bariatric Surgery Patients

  • Natalie Liu
    ,
  • Meghan C. Cusack
    ,
  • Manasa Venkatesh
    ,
  • Anisa L. Pontes
    ,
  • Grace Shea
    ,
  • Dillon C. Svoboda
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
    ,
  • Indiana University Bloomington
    ,
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative testing of anastomoses and staples lines is commonly performed to minimize the risk of postoperative leaks in bariatric surgery, but its impact is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the association between leak testing and 30-d postoperative leak, bleed, reoperation, and readmission rates for patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG)or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Methods: This is a retrospective observational study utilizing 2015-2016 data from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. Postoperative outcomes were compared using χ 2 test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with 30-d outcomes. Results: We included 237,081 patients. Leak testing was performed on 73.0% and 92.1% of LSG and RYGB patients, respectively. LSG was associated with lower rates of leak, bleed, reoperation, and readmission than RYGB. On multivariable analysis, intraoperative leak testing was associated with increased rates of postoperative leak for LSG and RYGB (OR 1.48 and 1.90, respectively)and lower rates of bleed for LSG (OR 0.76). There were no significant associations between leak testing and rates of reoperation or readmission. Conclusions: Use of intraoperative leak testing was not associated with improved outcomes for either LSG or RYGB. A prospective trial investigating leak testing is warranted to better elucidate its impact.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 136-144 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Surgical Research (Volume 242)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 10/2019

Publication status

Published - 10/2019

ISSN

0022-4804

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85065140075
  • PubMed: 31077945

Publication metrics

Metrics

Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.11
Fractional count
8
Fractional count
0.89
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
13
Captures
33

Funding Details

Efforts on this study and article were made possible by an American College of Surgeons George H.A. Clowes Career Development Award and a VA Career Development Award to Luke Funk (CDA 015-060). The views represented in this article represent those of the authors and not those of the DVA or the U.S. Government. In addition, this study is funded through the NIH T32 Surgical Oncology Research Training Program ( T32 CA090217-17 ) and the NIH T35 Surgery Summer Research Experience for Medical Students Program (T35DK062709). Efforts on this study and article were made possible by an American College of Surgeons George H.A. Clowes Career Development Award and a VA Career Development Award to Luke Funk (CDA 015-060). The views represented in this article represent those of the authors and not those of the DVA or the U.S. Government. In addition, this study is funded through the NIH T32 Surgical Oncology Research Training Program (T32 CA090217-17)and the NIH T35 Surgery Summer Research Experience for Medical Students Program (T35DK062709). Author's contributions: L.M.F. N.L. M.C. and M.V. contributed to study design. N.L. M.C. M.V. A.L.P. G.S. D.C.S. and L.M.F. contributed to data collection and analysis. N.L. M.C. and L.M.F. contributed to manuscript composition. All coauthors participated in the data interpretation and manuscript revisions. All coauthors approved the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
FundersFunding numbers
NIH
T35DK062709
NCI
T32CA090217
NIH
-