Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

A comparison of electrophoretic resolution for snapshot and finish-line imaging

  • John C. Sutherland(corresponding author)
    ,
  • David J. Fisk
    ,
  • Denise C. Monteleone
    ,
  • John G. Trunk
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Finish-line imaging, in which DNA or other macromolecules are detected after electrophoresis for a constant distance, usually improves resolution compared to snapshot imaging, in which molecules are electrophoresed for a constant time in an apparatus of comparable dimensions. Resolving power, which is an objective measure of the ability of different separatory methods to detect closely spaced molecular species, can be used to compare directly the performance of systems employing both snapshot and finish-line imaging [E. A. Ribeiro and J. C. Sutherland, Anal. Biochem. 210, 378-388 (1993)]. Experimentally determined values of resolving power are influenced both by the method of imaging (snapshot vs finish-line) and by instrument-specific factors that affect resolution. Previous comparisons of the resolving power obtained with finish-line and snapshot imaging involved data sets acquired by different instruments with different instrumental resolutions. To reduce the influence of instrumental effects, we constructed a scanning laser fluorometer that can measure both snapshot and finish-line images of fluorochrome-labeled DNA. Snapshot and finish-line images of a DNA sample containing HaeII restriction fragments of the DNA from bacteriophage T7, which range in length from 474 to 6514 base pairs, were obtained under otherwise identical electrophoretic conditions. Snapshot and finish-line imaging give similar resolving powers for DNA molecules up to about 1.5 kbp long. For both imaging modes, maximum resolving power was achieved for DNA molecules between 2 and 3 kbp in length. For larger DNA molecules, finish- line imaging provided higher resolving power. The ratio of the resolving power of finishline images to that of snapshot images increased monotonically as a function of DNA length. For the longest restriction fragments studied (6514 bp), the resolving power for finish.line images exceeded that of snapshot images by about 50%.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 136-144 (9 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Analytical Biochemistry (Volume 239, Issue 2)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 08/01/1996

Publication status

Published - 08/01/1996

ISSN

0003-2697

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0030219860
  • PubMed: 8811892

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.25
Fractional count
3
Fractional count
0.75
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
0.22
SciVal
Author count
4
SciVal
citations
5
SciVal
Paper percentile
49

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
5
Captures
2

Funding Details

We thank Drs. Betsy Sutherland, John Dunn, Mark Quasada, and Peter Takacs for helpful discussions and assistance with the construction and evaluation of the laser scanner, Dr. F. William Studier for his support of this project, and Kiley Reynolds and David Soren-son for their comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by the Of®ce of Health and Environmental Research, U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract DE-AC02±76CH00016.
FundersFunding number
Office of Health and Environmental Research
-
USDOE
DE-AC02±76CH00016