Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

A novel approach to AFM characterization of adhesive tooth-biomaterial interfaces

  • Y. Yoshida
    ,
  • B. Van Meerbeek(corresponding author)
    ,
  • J. Snauwaert
    ,
  • L. Hellemans
    ,
  • P. Lambrechts
    ,
  • G. Vanherle
*Corresponding author for this work
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

A novel approach is proposed for studying tooth-biomaterial interactions with high resolution. Thus far, polished interfaces examined by AFM have not disclosed much detail, mainly due to the destruction of soft surface texture and the smearing of polishing debris across the interface that obscures the actual ultra-structure. Therefore the practical utility of diamond-knife microtomy as a sample preparation technique for imaging tooth-biomaterial interfaces by AFM with high resolution was tested in this study and compared to that of ultra-fine mechanical polishing techniques. The AFM images clearly demonstrated the enhanced potential of diamond-knife microtomy for nondestructively producing clean cross-sections through interfaces that allow the interfacial ultra-structure to be imaged by AFM with a resolution equaling that of TEM. This novel approach opens the field to the full range of scanning probe microscopy, including physical and chemical surface characterization of interfaces with a mix of soft and hard substrates.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 85-90 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research (Volume 47, Issue 1)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 1999

Publication status

Published - 1999

ISSN

0021-9304

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 0032799062
  • PubMed: 10400885

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
0.75
SciVal
Author count
8
SciVal
citations
48
SciVal
Paper percentile
85
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.13
Fractional count
7
Fractional count
0.88
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
26
Citation count
50