Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

A quality-adjusted survival time without symptoms or toxicities analysis of glasdegib plus low-dose cytarabine versus low-dose cytarabine as initial therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in patients who are not considered candidates for intensive chemotherapy

  • Caitlyn T. Solem(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Timothy J. Bell
    ,
  • Youngmin Kwon
    ,
  • Joseph C. Cappelleri
    ,
  • Courtney Johnson
    ,
  • Helen Bhattacharyya
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Pharmerit - an OPEN Health Company
    ,
  • Pfizer
    ,
  • University of Pittsburgh
    ,
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Background: In a randomized study, glasdegib (a hedgehog inhibitor) plus low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) significantly prolonged survival in comparison with LDAC in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease progression or toxicity (Q-TWiST) approach was used to evaluate comparative quality-adjusted survival. Methods: Overall survival was partitioned into the following: time with any treatment-emergent grade 3 or higher adverse events (TOX); time without symptoms of disease progression or toxicity (TWiST); and time after treatment discontinuation due to insufficient clinical response, relapse, or death time after progression (REL). Q-TWiST was calculated by multiplying the restricted mean time in each state by respective utilities and then summing up the utility-adjusted time. Results: At 20 months of follow-up, the survival probabilities for the glasdegib-LDAC arm and the LDAC arm were 28.2% and 7.9%, respectively. Glasdegib-LDAC patients (n = 78), in comparison with LDAC patients (n = 38), had significantly longer mean TWiST (+3.4 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-5.2 months) and TOX (+0.8 months; 95% CI, 0.1-1.6 months) and longer but nonsignificant REL (+0.3 months; 95% CI, −1.9 to 2.3 months). Q-TWiST was 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.1-5.8 months) longer with glasdegib plus LDAC, and this translated into a 75% relative improvement in quality-adjusted survival with respect to LDAC. Results were robust to the length of follow-up (6-24 months) and remained significant when all adverse events, regardless of grade, were included. Conclusions: These results suggest that most of the survival benefit from glasdegib plus LDAC versus LDAC alone is TWiST, and this represents added time in relatively “good” health. These results support the clinical value of glasdegib plus LDAC as initial therapy for AML in patients for whom intensive chemotherapy is not an option.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 4315-4321 (7 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Cancer (Volume 126, Issue 19)

Publication milestones

  • Accepted/In press - 2020
  • Published - 10/01/2020

Publication status

Published - 10/01/2020

ISSN

0008-543X

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85088293885
  • ORCID: /0000-0002-8636-1071/work/81263418
  • PubMed: 32697335

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
SciVal
citations
2
SciVal
FWCI
0.73
SciVal
Author count
8
SciVal
Paper percentile
78
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.13
Fractional count
7
Fractional count
0.88
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
6
Captures
22

Funding Details

This study was funded by Pfizer, Inc. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center is supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant P30 CA016672).
FundersFunding number
NIH
P30 CA016672
Pfizer
-