Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Access to radiologic reports via a patient portal: Clinical simulations to investigate patient preferences

  • Annette J. Johnson(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Doug Easterling
    ,
  • Roman Nelson
    ,
  • Michael Y. Chen
    ,
  • Richard M. Frankel
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Wake Forest University
    ,
  • Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine (1) the patient-preferred timing characteristics of a system for online patient access to radiologic reports and (2) patient resource needs and preferences after exposure to reports. Methods: Adult outpatients from a single imaging center completed researcher-administered electronic questionnaires. Participants were exposed to 3 simulated clinical scenarios and asked to answer questions on the basis of what they thought they would do in each. Scenarios included symptomatology and written radiology reports that were nearly normal, seriously abnormal, and indeterminate, with reports containing typical medical terminology. Participants were asked about preferred timing for online access to reports, communication methods, educational resources, and alternative formats. McNemar's test correlated proportions and generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate responses. Results: Participants (n = 53) most often preferred immediate access to reports: 32 (60.2%) for the nearly normal scenario, 25 (47.2%) for the seriously abnormal scenario, and 24 (45.3%) for the indeterminate scenario. Three-day delayed access was next most commonly preferred: 15 (28.3%), 19 (35.8%), and 19 (35.8%), respectively. Forty-two participants (79.2%) preferred the portal method of notification over ways they have historically gotten results, with an increased proportion being satisfied with it overall (P <.04). Most would use a variety of educational resources and found alternative lay language conclusions and hyperlinks helpful. Conclusions: Some outpatients want immediate online access to complete, written radiologic reports and would use multiple resources to understand report contents. Effects of immediate access on provider workflow and on anxiety and autonomy among a diverse population of patients still need to be studied.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 256-263 (8 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of the American College of Radiology (Volume 9, Issue 4)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 04/2012

Publication status

Published - 04/2012

ISSN

1546-1440

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 84926231836

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
citations
55
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.20
Fractional count
4
Fractional count
0.80
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations
SciVal
FWCI
1.47
SciVal
Author count
5
SciVal
Paper percentile
93
SciVal
Top percentile
10

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
75
Mentions
2
Captures
77