Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Suspected Osteomyelitis, Septic Arthritis, or Soft Tissue Infection (Excluding Spine and Diabetic Foot)

  • Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging
    ,
  • Francesca D. Beaman(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Paul F. von Herrmann
    ,
  • Mark J. Kransdorf
    ,
  • Ronald S. Adler
    ,
  • Behrang Amini
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Kentucky
    ,
  • Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, AZ
    ,
  • New York University
    ,
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
    ,
  • VA Medical Center
    ,
  • Orthopaedics and Rheumatology of the North Shore
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Infection of the musculoskeletal system is a common clinical problem. Differentiating soft tissue from osseous infection often determines the appropriate clinical therapeutic course. Radiographs are the recommend initial imaging examination, and although often not diagnostic in acute osteomyelitis, can provide anatomic evaluation and alternative diagnoses influencing subsequent imaging selection and interpretation. MRI with contrast is the examination of choice for the evaluation of suspected osteomyelitis, and MRI, CT, and ultrasound can all be useful in the diagnosis of soft tissue infection. CT or a labeled leukocyte scan and sulfur colloid marrow scan combination are alternative options if MRI is contraindicated or extensive artifact from metal is present. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages S326-S337

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of the American College of Radiology (Volume 14, Issue 5)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 05/2017

Publication status

Published - 05/2017

ISSN

1546-1440

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85018429696
  • PubMed: 28473089

Publication metrics

Metrics

Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.07
Fractional count
14
Fractional count
0.93
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
SciVal
FWCI
2.79
SciVal
Author count
15
SciVal
citations
24
SciVal
Paper percentile
91
SciVal
Top percentile
10

PlumX, opens in new tab

Citation count
78
Captures
120