Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging After Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging
    ,
  • Mary G. Hochman(corresponding author)
    ,
  • Yulia V. Melenevsky
    ,
  • Darlene F. Metter
    ,
  • Catherine C. Roberts
    ,
  • Jenny T. Bencardino
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
    ,
  • ,
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
    ,
  • Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, AZ
    ,
  • New York University
    ,
  • University of Kentucky
Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the most commonly performed joint replacement procedure in the United States and annual demand for primary TKA is expected to grow by 673% by 2030. The first part provides an overview of imaging modalities (radiographs, CT, MRI, ultrasound, and various nuclear medicine studies) and discusses their usefulness in the imaging evaluation of TKA. The second part focuses on evidence-based imaging and imaging-guided intervention algorithms for the workup of TKA and its complications, including routine follow-up, component wear, periprosthetic infection, aseptic loosening, granulomas/osteolysis, conventional and rotational instability, periprosthetic fracture, patellar complications, and a variety of periprosthetic soft tissue abnormalities. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages S421-S448

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Journal of the American College of Radiology (Volume 14, Issue 11)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 11/01/2017

Publication status

Published - 11/01/2017

ISSN

1546-1440

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 85032790301

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
FWCI
1.14
SciVal
Author count
14
SciVal
citations
10
SciVal
Paper percentile
75
Scopus
citations
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.07
Fractional count
13
Fractional count
0.93
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
79
Citation count
39