Skip to search boxSkip to navigationSkip to main content

Adequacy of antidepressant treatment by psychiatric residents: The antidepressant treatment history form as a possible assessment tool

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Open access

Sustainable Development Goals

  • SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well

Abstract

Objective: Facility in psychopharmacology is a major goal of psychiatric residency. This study assesses the adequacy of pharmacotherapy provided to depressed patients in a resident clinic. Methods: Charts of all 285 patients seen in an outpatient triage clinic during 2000 were reviewed. One hundred twelve patients had diagnoses of major depression, dysthymia, depressive disorder not otherwise specified, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, or bipolar disorder with a documented depressed episode during the studied period. Pharmacotherapy prescribed to these 112 patients was rated using the Antidepressant Treatment History Form (ATHF). Also analyzed were weeks in treatment and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Severity score assigned retrospectively. Results: Of the 112 charts subjected to detailed review, 49.1% documented adequate treatment. Antidepressant Treatment History Form ratings increased with treatment duration. No correlation was found between ATHF ratings and CGI ratings. Conclusions: Results suggest that time retained in treatment is a major factor in treatment adequacy.

Publication Information

Output type

Scholary Output:
Contribution to journal
Article
Peer-review

Original language

English (US)

Pages from-to (Number of pages)

Pages 283-288 (6 pages)

Journal (Volume, Issue Number)

Academic Psychiatry (Volume 29, Issue 3)

Publication milestones

  • Published - 07/2005

Publication status

Published - 07/2005

ISSN

1042-9670

Publication IDs

  • Scopus: 33644808790
  • PubMed: 16141125
  • ORCID: /0000-0001-5035-7858/work/51379460
  • Scopus: 33644808790

Publication metrics

Metrics

SciVal
Author count
3
SciVal
citations
16
SciVal
Paper percentile
69
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
0.33
Fractional count
2
Fractional count
0.67
Fractional count
1
Fractional count
1
Scopus
citations

PlumX, opens in new tab

Captures
43
Citation count
26